Universal Modus Tollens Rule

preview_player
Показать описание
Discrete Mathematics: Universal Modus Tollens Rule
Topics discussed:
1) The Universal Modus Tollens Rule.
2) An example based on Universal Modus Tollens Rule.

Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]

#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #UniversalModusTollensRule
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

1) Let, P - x is computer science major.
Q - x is taking discrete maths course.

For all P(x) -> Q(x)
Q(riya)
P(riya) -> Q(riya) -By universal

So, P(riya) - Fallacy

2) Let, P - x eats granola everyday.
Q - x is healthy.
For all P(x) -> Q(x)
~ Q(Linda)
P(Linda) -> Q(Linda) -By universal

So, ~ P(Linda) -Modus Tollens

the_ocean_eyes
Автор

1.) False (Fallacy of Affirming Conclusion)
2.) True (Universal Modus Tollens)

SamSam-gxql
Автор

Finished Chapter 1 and Chapter 2. Thank you so much !!

rajeshprajapati
Автор

1.)I think 1st sentence false
2.)1. For all x{p(x)->q(x)} -premise
2. ~q(linda)-premise instantiation from 1]
4.~p(linda)[modus stollen from 2, 3]
~p(linda)
So this is TRUE according to UNIVERSAL MODU'S STOLLEN RULE
Sir thanks a lot indeed sir this is very useful to me my text book couldn't help to me but your explanation is helpful very much 👌🙏🙏🙏

JD-ebqu
Автор

Thank you so much sir for this amazing explanation

saswateesahoo
Автор

Let p(x) denotes "x is a computer science"
Q(x) denotes "x takes discrete mathematics course"
a)1.forall x(p(x)->q(x)) premise
2.p(ria) premise
3.p(ria)->q(ria)
(by universal Instantiation (1))
4.q(ria) (by modus ponens from2&3)

saimalli
Автор

a) False, Fallacy of affirming the conclusion.
b) True, Universal Modus Tollens

jayxcoder
Автор

Modus Ponens: p -> q OR [(p -> q) ^ p] -> p
p

q

Modus Tollens: p -> q OR [(p -> q) ^ ¬q] -> ¬p
¬q

¬p

Universal Instantiation: this rule is used to conclude that P(c) is true when ∀xP(x) is true.
∀xP(x)

P(c)

A) Let P(x) denotes "x is a computer science major"
Q(x) denotes "x takes discrete mathematics course"

∀x(P(x) -> Q(x)) Premise
Q(Ria) Premise
P(Ria) -> Q(Ria) By universal instantiation from (1)
P(Ria) = ? Fallacy -> Affirming the consequence (Ria could take discrete mathematics course and not being a computer science major)

B) Let P(x) denotes "x eats granola everyday"
Q(x) denotes "x is healthy"

∀x(P(x) -> Q(x)) Premise
¬Q(Linda) Premise
P(Linda) -> Q(Linda) By universal instantiation from (1)
¬P(Linda) Modus tollens from (2) and (3)

acriziosouza
Автор

i liked this channel very much. but sir i want give you a tip that you are not making playlist names of recent videos, for example your playlist analog electronics consist of serial videos arranged together so for new subscribers it becomes easy to study, what they want to.

CHATUR__RAMALINGAM
Автор

First is false and second one is true ?

harshsharma
Автор

HELP!
Everyone in math class loves proof. Someone in math class have never taken calculus. Conclusion Someone who loves proof have never taken calculus.

shivajichalise_
Автор

Sorry To Say But I Am Watching This Playlist From beginning But After video No. 45 I am Not Able To Understand Your Videos I don't Know why I am not Able To Understand because i watched every video atleast 2 time but still the Concept Is Not Clear to Me
This could be due to You Are Teaching Very Fast Or switching the topics fast Please don't Take It As hate Because i Love to watch your Videos So Take It As my Feedback
"Thanks"

gamexd