Supreme Court Issues 7-2 Decision

Episode Resources:

🔵 Supreme Court Ruling:

🔵 Case Background:

--
© All Rights Reserved.

[markjohnston]

Judges that "failed to act" and let violent criminals go, and repeat their criminal acts. Are they exempt from this law?

[SavagePatriot-ripx]

So no-cash bail decisions where the offenders commit another violent crime should make the judge an accessory to a violent crime? Excellent!!!!

[sentinel]

Don't we already have "conpsiracy to commit murder" as a crime?

[jasonkirk]

There is a big difference between not trying to save someone and planning to do harm to someone.

[i-primeproductions]

This is a dangerous ruling if taken out of context. The Nuance is the analogy with the Lifeguard was that he never plotted violence but refused to help when there was an opportunity. In the other instance the perpetrator plotted and intended violence against another person intentionally.

[michaelroberts]

Murder for hire has always been illegal..

[ZenThruAnger]

Well, a group posted the location of Teslas and Tesla dealerships all around the country, inspiring violence against Tesla and Tesla owners. How about charging them? Doxxing and swatting also falls under that rule.

[cathyvanatta]

Conspiracy to commit murder is an act of violence. So, I hope he is in jail.

[michaelbaja]

Ms. Crockett is guilty of inciting crimes of violence then...ARREST HER!

[BytomGirl]

So, inciting the violence is committing the violence which would qualify many democrats doing so for a prison sentence

[CowboyJeff]

They just slid down the slippery slope we've been on for decades

[jeromeweaver]

There is a distinction between giving someone a gun to kill someone, and the life guard doing nothing to save someone drowning.

[Americaisgreat-wf]

This law will not put those in jail who do this sort of thing every week on tv. AOC, J. Crockett, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, all of them have called for violence on TV, are they going to be charged and imprisoned under this new law?

[smw]

Isn't this the same court that says the cops have no legal duty to help anyone

[rodneycampbell]

Not much different from being the get-away driver in a robbery. Being an accomplice makes the driver equally guilty.

[anyssakim]

I vaguely recall some lunatics accusing their political opposition with, "Silence is violence" when not vociferously voicing agreement to their cause

[orangegryphon]

The ruling lacked clarity. The opposing opinion shows the lack of clarity. This will not end well.

[Bhatmann]

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
This is what life has come down to.

[TheLordmep]

So, self-defense is illegal, but not defending yourself and others is also illegal? Great design.

[donalddarbonne]

When the police are sued for not stopping a man from killing his wife, even with a restraining order, we'll see how things turn around.