Unraveling the Sons of God Controversy in the Bible

Explore the fascinating controversy surrounding the 'Sons of God' in this engaging video. We delve into biblical interpretations from the pre-flood era, examining the intriguing idea that angelic beings may have mingled with humans, leading to the legendary giants. Join us for this thought-provoking journey! #SonsOfGod #BiblicalControversy #PreFloodEra #AngelicBeings #GiantLegends #Interpretation #ReligiousDebate #HistoricalAnalysis #Mythology #SpiritualJourney

[pl]

This is the true teacher there is no one absolutely no one that can teach you this fantastic book better than Les Feldick so simple that even youngsters can understand it
So if you don’t know this book this is your chance you are going to be amazed 🙏

[carolehorton]

In this short, they never gave Les time to complete his explanation on this point. Please read: 2 PET. 2:4 & JUDE 6.

[bryanrendleman]

No controversy.
Humans don't have Giants as offspring !
God would have said sons of Adam or men if they were just humans.

[sammcrae]

It's a shame that Les didn't get a chance to finish the paragraph. Unfortunately, I've noticed that the shorts for Les are too short. Because now I'm very curious about what he has to say about this particular question.

I would hope that he'd be on the sons of God side of it, rather than the sons of Seth hypothesis (which is totally unscriptural), but I don't feel like listening to his thousands of hours of materials to try to find it. So, maybe they will either start making 60 second shorts, or putting out a part two, or something.

But I am fairly certain that I have heard Les Feldick come down on the fallen angels -- sons of God side of the argument.
🙏✝️👑✝️🙏

[lindagarris]

Umm what controversy?? Bible clear. Aren't there bones of giants?

[gskessingerable]

Les has this one wrong. The sons of God were angels who impregnated the daughters of men.