'Stop and Frisk': Unconstitutional or Not?

preview_player
Показать описание
Legal consultant Kent Zimmerman discusses the controversy surrounding "stop and frisk" policing, supported by Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, on Lunch Break. He and WSJ's Tanya Rivero discuss pressure on local jurisdictions to eliminate stop and frisk in the face of rising murder rates across the U.S. Photo: Getty

Subscribe to the WSJ channel here:

More from the Wall Street Journal:

More from the Wall Street Journal:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm a lowkey Trump supporter but stop and frisk is a blatant violation of the 4th amendment.

redtra
Автор

Totally illegal, total violation of the Bill of Rights.

jerrydoyle
Автор

Fourth amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,

JustAGuyProduction
Автор

How about you expand it to roadside checkpoints where everyone is forced to have full cavity searches performed on them? "You don't have anything to hide so you shouldn't be worried right?"

herewardthewatchful
Автор

It's an "UnAmerican" construct. The Court is letting them do it though.

martin
Автор

im disappointed they aren't telling the truth

lucasromero
Автор

It's not, because I have been stopped by police and they asked for my ID since I looked like a suspect of a armed robbery. The police checked and found that I'm not a suspect and allowed me to pick up my keys, wallet, money, and other items on the trunk of the cop car. #commonsense

mrman
join shbcf.ru