A-Level Edexcel Core Maths C3 June 2011 Q7b : ExamSolutions

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You've made this look so much harder than it actually is. Using the quotient rule to differentiate means you can do this in about 3 minutes

Parky
Автор

product rule seems to work the best imo
y=5[(2x+1)(x+3)]^-1
y=5t^-1
t=2x^2+7x+3

dy/dt = -5t^-2 .. 
dt/dx = 4x+7

dy/dx = -5(t)^-2 * 4x+7
simplifies to:

-5(4x+7) all over t^2

to sum up: dy/dx = -5(4x+7)÷(2x^2+7x+3)^2

junaidsangal
Автор

It is in C4 and so you should at this level do it as [(2x+1)(x+3)]^-1 and use the chain rule.

ExamSolutions_Maths
Автор

It's not that long! You can use your method though, I agree.

ExamSolutions_Maths
Автор

@samjjak That's ok - pleased to hear that it helped.

ExamSolutions_Maths
Автор

If you split F(x) into partial fractions, you get f(x) = 2(2x+1)^-1 - (x+3)^-1
so you work out F'(x) = -4/(2x+1)^2 + 1/(x+3)^2
when you put in your x value, gradient of tangent pops out as -15/4 and its plain sailing from there.
just another method for anyone who finds this one a little taxing :)

benqureshi
Автор

Just use the quotient rule, it works. Implicit differentiation is in C4 so ur not supposed to know if for C3,

PimpmaPC
Автор

you differentiated it in a very long way, you could have multiplied out the bottom and raised the whole term to power -1 giving 5(2x^2 + 7x + 3)^-1 where you can easily use chain rule!

zaklondon
Автор

Why use the quotient rule when you have a constant on the top of the fraction.

ExamSolutions_Maths
Автор

It sounds like you are integrating rather than differentiating.

ExamSolutions_Maths
Автор

Cant do this method as implicit differentiation not in core 3 spec but thanks anyway

Ace-qwgy
Автор

Is it wrong to split the original fraction into partial fractions and then differentiate it creating natural logs?

MrSandersHD
Автор

Why can't you use the quotient rule????

bobmarley
Автор

Can I use the quotient rule? reply asap please!

vHamadx
Автор

bruv everyones sleeping now, i havnt tried quotient rule but why don't u just use the simple chain rule ; u=2x^2+7x+3 and then u^-1 it ..., I'm awake till morning if u needed any help, good luck mate

amirkh
Автор

What's wrong with the quotient rule?

mrtictac
Автор

Ah, scratch that. Looks like this paper has had some positives mis-transcribed as negatives. ;_;

Alexbrainbox
Автор

This video is going to confuse the hell out of you, use quotient rule instead

mohammedaabid
Автор

na dude, can't sleep, I'm a night worker guy / lol

amirkh
Автор

you should really go bed, its early in the morning dude!

vHamadx