History vs. Augustus - Peta Greenfield & Alex Gendler

preview_player
Показать описание


His reign marked the beginning of one of history’s greatest empires … and the end of one of its first republics. Was Rome’s first emperor a visionary leader who guaranteed his civilization’s place in history, or a tyrant who destroyed its core values? Peta Greenfield and Alex Gendler put this controversial figure on trial in History vs. Augustus.

Lesson by Peta Greenfield & Alex Gendler, animation by Brett Underhill.

Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Stephanie Perozo, Marc Bilodeau, Ruby Solorzano, Ivan Tsenov, Claudia Mayfield, Pavel Zalevskiy, Yankai Liu, Duo Xu, Ghassan Alhazzaa, Miloš Stevanović, Joy Love Om, Gi Nam Lee, Shawn Quichocho, Simone Kidner, Anika Westburg, Barun Padhy, Brandy Jones, Devin Harris, Tony Trapuzzano, Stephen Michael Alvarez, Tom Lee, Juliana, Jason Weinstein, Kris Siverhus, Alexander Walls, Annamaria Szilagyi, Morgan Williams, Abhijit Kiran Valluri, Mandeep Singh, Sama aafghani, سلطان الخليفي, Marylise CHAUFFETON, Marvin Vizuett, Jayant Sahewal, Quinn Shen, Caleb ross, Elizabeth Cruz, Elnathan Joshua Bangayan, Gaurav Rana, Mullaiarasu Sundaramurthy, Jose Henrique Leopoldo e Silva, Dan Paterniti, Jerome Froelich, Tyler Yoshizumi, and Martin Stephen.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Augustus was Machiavelli. He was the perfect Politician: capable of any cruelty, but not drunk on his own power. An actor who never lost control of his game.

raemont
Автор

"The Senate existed to serve the people, not a ruling elite"

Except membership to the Senate was restricted to that ruling elite.

Brandon-qn
Автор

Also a reminder that the Late Republic was one of the most corrupt societies on earth. Augustus effectively demolished that.

bartsfartandshart
Автор

"a government meant to serve the people, not the privileges of a ruling family"

Patricians: Yeah right..

amaljyothis
Автор

It's actually Mark Antony who betrayed Octavius Augustus, because Julius Ceasar adopted Augustus and designated him as his heir in his testament. And by the way: some restrictions on marriages in social classes were in effect before Augustus, Julius Ceasar actually avoided becoming a priest by commiting a misalliance.

pl
Автор

"I found Rome a city of bricks and left it a city of marble." - Augustus

kshitijaiyer
Автор

History vs Alexander the Great
History vs Bismark

Soo much potential ..

TheCJUN
Автор

The late Republic was an incredibly corrupt and unstable government that was on its last legs, it needed to go. Octavian began a period of peace (with the exception of the year of the four emperors) and stability that lasted for more than two hundred years.

connorgolden
Автор

Augustus was an absolute legend. Sure he didn't actually fight his battles (he let Agrippna do that for him), but he did bring stability back to Rome after years of Civil War and he destroyed the corrupted Roman Republic. He was most likely the most hydrated Roman out there.

boolosboi
Автор

I will now become a lawyer with the sole purpose of saying MERE OPTICS in an actual trial.

prometeo_X
Автор

"A government meant to rule the people, not a ruling family."
Boy howdy, you guys don't know anything about the Roman Republic do you?

Varan
Автор

By giving one side the last word, instead of the neutral judge, this video takes a side. The fact of the matter is that equating the Roman senate with modern day Democratic Republics is flawed. The senators were oligarchs more concerned with keeping labor cheap and themselves rich over the good of the Republic to the detriment of the common citizen. They were not elected public servants. Was Augustus(and Caesar before him) power hungry, ambitious and sometimes even cruel? Yes. Did they both have an objectively positive effect on their society, also yes. Don't hate the past for not being the present.

Shredow
Автор

Im gonna go with unbiased history on this one.

pershingchaffee
Автор

Augustus was just as badass as Julius Caesar, and this trial failed to point out that Augustus (when he was Octavian) personally fulfilled the terms of Caesar's will which included giving the plebs a share of Caesar's money that was owed to them, and plots of land to 20, 000 deserving families. Mark Antony refused to fulfill the terms, so Octavian sold away Caesar's villa to meet these terms.

KTChamberlain
Автор

Augustus started the pax romana, ended conquest and under him and after him for nearly one hundred years there was no civil war

carloborromeoarese
Автор

"He made an empire that would collapse."
"Do you know why it collapsed?"
"No, why."
"Let me show you. Please stand infront of this tank please"

hunnic_warlord
Автор

"The next time you say how Rome didn't contribute enough inventions to broader history and get rightly arrested for sacrilege, first check what alphabet you're speaking when pleading for innocence, the architecture of the courthouse you're taken to, what God you're praying to to get out of this alive, what legal system finds you guilty, and what concrete roads you're traversing as they throw your corpse into the sewer in two months: July, named after Julius Caesar. And don't forget your bacon breakfast."
~ Dovahhatty, 2020

ConnorLockhartYGO
Автор

History vs Malcolm X
History vs Erwin Rommel
History vs Winston Churchill
History vs Otto von Bismarck
History vs Ronald Reagan

dodec
Автор

I would love to see History vs Churchill next please.

thefrenchkiwi
Автор

Ensuring stability and legitimacy after a civil war isnt pretty. He was the man the for the job and he did it perfectly.

Maitapa