Border Protests a Potential Recruitment Zone for Extremists: Expert

A symbol of hate among weapons and ammunition seized during arrests at the Coutts border blockade. Jillian Code reports on how the protests could be a recruitment zone for extremism.

[bowbender]

Just when you thought MSM couldn't stoop any lower. Surprise

[mrstealyoblocks]

Define "extremists". Anyone with "unacceptable views" perhaps? Anyone who is conservative leaning? Anyone who hates Trudeau? Anyone who doesn't vote liberal? We see what mainstream media is doing during this whole thing.
And we're not buying it.

[Blackfaced]

Who the fck was the clown in the half blackblock outfit?

[loudigity]

City news you lost your repuation. Coutts mayor said weapons had nothing to do with blockade. Your all on the wrong side of history

[nastyvinylcunter]

Better check the local mosques buddy boy 👍

[ferociousgustafson]

Gonna show any evidence, or anecdote, data, anything? Just the fearmongering of a dude with a camera?

[martytrueblood]

who made the guns?..
extremists?.
or corporates?..

[SirDubington]

is this guy just an expert in having bad opinions or does he have credentials

[hannahanna]

In Australia the banded truckers protest but alowed LGBTQ parade.. in tje name of covid19 fredom

[joeysully]

That’s not what the protests are about.

[TheRealBatCave]

These r the type of shitbirds that ruin things for normal people, very frustrating.

[microsoft-pox]

God bless our brave truckers! 🙏🏻
Every freedom loving human on the planet is with you! 💪🏻🇨🇦

[loudigity]

Everyone has watched the livestreams and knows the truth there videos of canadians hugging and singing when coutts opened if police thought it was dangerous why would they hug?

[stchs]

Freedom is dangerous! Give the government more powers to keep us all safe!
History shows they do no wrong!


Sarcasm if you made it this far 🤣

[bonsang]

The Charter recognizes the right to strike under Section 2(d), the right to freedom of association and that “the purpose of the protection of freedom of association is to protect collective action” (Lavigne v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union). As with the other rights protected under the Charter, the right to freedom of association is limited by of the Charter’s Section 1 which states: “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”. Freedom of association has been interpreted by Courts to mean that employees have the ability to pursue workplace goals and activities in substantive ways, such as through the practice of collective bargaining. This covers the ability to engage in discussions with and amongst themselves, present demands and negotiate with the employers. In order for collective bargaining to be meaningful, a party must be able to withdraw services. (Department of Justice, Section 2(d)- Freedom of Association). Within legal limits, collective bargaining cannot be considered meaningful without strike negotiations. The Supreme Court of Canada, in its decision Sask Fed of Labour v SK, stated that employees having the opportunity to withdraw their services is an integral component of the freedom of association and that “this crucial role in collective bargaining is why the right to strike is constitutionally protected by s. 2(d).”

Strike means : to arrive with a detrimental effect, to afflict suddenly, to come into forceful contact and it is a right granted by the charter.

[electricuniverse]

And so the smear campaign intensifies!

[ferociousgustafson]

So the cops grabbed them? Sounds like the system works.

[Jon-gmsn]

Well this random guy knows everything about nothing. At least he got paid to for the lies

[bookreaderson]

Gee I wonder how ther trying to soin this.

[nvanguy]

City news is the absolute worst for misleading propoganda in the titles of their cheesy videos