Just Another Fox News! WSJ Isn't a Serious Publication Anymore | Bulwark Takes

Mona Charen and Sam Stein discuss the WSJ blaming Joe Biden for mistrust in the government without once naming Donald Trump, and how conservative media is failing it's readers and viewers.

[MonicaLea]

WSJ stopped being a serious newspaper the minute Murdock bought them. But they aren't alone given what NYT and ABC have done.

[thfpnw]

The WSJ is thoroughly ruined by Rupert Murdoch.

[douglashogg]

Murdoch turned the Wall Street Journal into Fox News for people who read.

[Lanirderosa-dm]

I'm sick sick sick of him
and he hasn't even been sworn in yet

[Handyman.]

All media will be forced to kiss the orange taint or endure the anger of the treasonous one. This is insane.

[MARGORYPlacha]

The Wall Street Journal died the day Rupert Murdock bought it.

[rtk]

I used to be a regular WSJ reader but no more. Several years ago I lost faith. When I see WSJ I just go to the next article.

[Serken]

"Beclowned, " def will be putting that into rotation.

[Jeannie-du]

💙 Thanks for standing up and speaking out with us for truth, facts, and democracy! 👍🏽🗽🇺🇲

[StevenAaa-uclg]

My two favourite commentators - polite and respectful and softly spoken.

[jimpalmer]

Man, Mona is lit up and it's a glorious thing to see.

[joaquincapiro]

So true! Conservative is fine, a mouthpiece for trumpism is NOT!

[eschwarz]

THANK YOU MONA, for calling this to attention. WSJ used to give room for one to form their own opinion based on some solid information even if the entity as a whole had a conservative scope of interest.

[fjkelley]

I gave up on all parts of the _Journal_, including the reporting, once it was acquired by Murdoch. I use the _Financial Times_ for economic news. The preposterous commitment to Trump must be humiliating to any who might still be "conservative".

[theonlyendlesscircle]

It just shows the decline of the intelligence of their readers! There was a time that WSJ wouldn't write such drivel because they'd never get away with such nonsense.

[TheresaMynatt-mj]

“They’re eating the cats, they’re eating the dogs “

[dstyslinger]

Reading even the front page of WSJ is unbearable. Cancelled

[bionic_woman]

I’m a liberal, and I would read the WSJ. I didn’t always agree with policy positions, but found it balanced and impartial. It’s like the current National Review now. I’ve emailed several contributors disputing pieces with facts.

[bianca-sgzq]

When I was a teen ages ago, I got a subscription the to WSJ because the articles were well-written and researched, even if I didn't always agree with the politics. I'm a radical (in the pure sense of the word as that is someone who seeks to get to the root of the problem.) Now, it's simply trash and propaganda.

[jodijones]

I started reading WSJ in Business school back about 20 years ago at Mississippi State. It's always been conservative, but recently it's veered even more to the right