doctrine of precedent

An introduction to doctrine of precedent, especially for A level law

[walterdasilva]

This actually makes sense now . Learnt more in 11 minutes than in one whole year at uni . Thank you so much for this content, very much appreciated 🎉

[yumbro]

very clear with good examples, thank you.

[reginabrown]

This should be how 1st year law school be taught... hahaha this make senses

[diirtystewiie]

This helped in understanding the Doctrine of Precedent

[taifahmed]

Hey....enjoying it from Bangladesh. Take love❤️

[marcelocaio]

I loved that video, i am a brazillian student!

[Diablo_Pole]

Great video. What's the name of the Pianist? I can't find it.

[amanpenefosterblankson]

waw! awesome, this very helpful. thanks

[mmaarriiaakirsche]

Thank you soo much from a german law student :-D (Y)

[vinayajoseph]

Could you also explain the variation in approach in the case of civil law countries?

[hjboss]

Good well and calmly spoken ... only thing u left out was overruling when mentioning on the list

[donthaveonedonthaveone]

(-_+)
thank you for letting me use your video!

[AbiScottx]

Thanks for this video really helped! How does stare decisis link to this? Not sure it’s exact definition and how it exactly fits into precedent? :)

[dieselforwethepeoplenews]

For instance the original Constitution is constitution for the United States 1871 they changed it Constitution of the United States you see the one keyword

[rehanlawclasses]

Fine video quite easier way to illustrate..liked it

[clintr]

It seems to me that “judges make laws” is incorrect. Granted I’m from the US so the system may be slightly different but, when the kid walks through the room with muddy feet, the law created to add a penalty to the mud has to be based on an existing law correct? The new rules are created on an existing precedent or a law made by the branch of government tasked to make law. It seems to me that precedent is more so defining an existing law rather than creating a new law from thin air.. as far as judges and courts are concerned.

[vadimthebrave]

There is no same cases as there is no same DNA or fingerprints. Every case has different circumstances and nuances.