Harpoon VS Neptune Anti Ship Missile

preview_player
Показать описание
Harpoon VS Neptune Anti Ship Missile

This video you will see a comparison between two anti ship Missiles. One is Harpoon Block II anti ship missile and another one is Neptune anti ship missile.

Harpoon is made by United States and
Neptune is made by Ukraine

#antishipmissile
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Neptune has gained much respect after it sunk Moskva 🔥

rryzzzi
Автор

our cruise missile Neptune has big potential, but is still far from perfect condition.

History_Profile
Автор

if it has modifications, why is it a clone then?

Константин-иво
Автор

GO UKRAINE!! 💙💛 From your friends in my beloved United States!! ❤🤍💙

Davethreshold
Автор

The fish and crab in the Black Sea send Luch Design Bureau their regards. They are getting all cozy and cuddled in their new habitat.

Vara
Автор

Looks like another success for Neptune with the admiral Marakov!

williamstephens
Автор

Neptun is a clone. ROFL
Seems like Ukrainians have really good spies.
That's not the best rocket by hardware, but mind job of ukrainian engineers is a master piece.

Farius
Автор

So basically, Harpoon has a bigger warhead but Neptune has more range?

seneca
Автор

Neptune has more range. Harpoon has heavier explosive.

ericcheng
Автор

"Soviet" is not "Russian" when something was from the Soviet Union it does not mean it was "russian"

Cola_Dulz
Автор

Both very formidable anti-ship missiles. I'd give the edge to the Harpoon for it's fragmentation and penetrator warhead designed to breach watertight compartments. It can also be fired from an F-16 so the range is in addition to that of the aircraft.

RedRage-zpqu
Автор

Seriously, no point in the hand animation. Good comparison though

ScaleMilitaryModels
Автор

The harpoon has more chance of knocking down a ship because it has bigger warhead...

philipunekwu
Автор

i can't understand how harpoon could be used. 100 km of range is really short. If it will be lounched by plane, at that distance an enemy ship could easly intercept or find the plane ( like the p-8) it could propably be used effectively only by stealth fighter like f-35. If it will be lounched by ship, it means that ship need to navigate near the enemy ship at less than 100 km, and that means the enemy ship securely find the ship by its radar, becouse new radar could find object over than 200 km away. Finally if it will be launched by a sub marine even at short range like 80-90 km it means that the sub position will be spawned becouse of the high noise of the missile launched by the tube. So how it could be used? Until now i can only consider tomahawk missle a good candidate as a good asm by its range over than 1000 km. Tomahawk could be launched very far by ship and guided by spy plane or satellite or other sub near enemy ships, or stealth fighter, and at the end of the run it could use is radar identification seeker. Until now tomahawk has also a similar speed as the harpoon, so why harpoon is could be used rather than new cruise missile?

ozbezarius
Автор

Neptune Anti Ship Cruise Missile of Ukraine already have sink one Russian Navy Moskva Flagship the Slava Class Cruise Missile ship in the Black Sea . Then Russia retaliate by firing short range missile Isklander missile that destroyed one Ammunition Depot that were the Neptune Anti ship Cruise Missile was store and then US and NATO responsed by supplying Ukraine with high precision guided Antì Ship cruise missile the Harpoon and Exocet Missile of France

robertosovietunion
Автор

Some block of Harpoons reach out to 315KM

trevortrevortsr
Автор

Harpoon seems kinda pathetic compared to neptune

Yellowsupercar
Автор

Pensar que não conseguimos nem ainda finalizar o Mansup. O Brasil tem uma costa enorme. Precisamos concluir o Mansup e a partir dele ou do AVMT-300 construir novos mísseis.

delima
Автор

Ukraine need to make anti-ship missile launching drones a thing.

Chisel_Chest
Автор

US navy has a new anti ship missile called the LRASM

lorenzo