Dielectric Field propagation and the influence of water

In this video, I announce the production of a more extensive research into dielectric fields. I will measure electrical potential and current on the load. We look into the propagation and influence we can assign for direct propagation of the field. Water is part of our life and has a huge impact on the propagation and absorption of dielectric fields.

[MasterIvo]

Have you researched impulsed dielectric fields?

[adityareddipalli]

I cannot find the link of schematic... Could you please provide as a reply

[rochaaraujo]

Maybe capacitance effect of water? Working as a antenna?

[ericsu]

Is that metallic semi-sphere on the left the original power source? What does it radiate?

[michaelperrone]

Thanks for testing my hypotheses from your previous video in the video on the member website! The effects are certainly near-field/higher order terms if the power falls off faster than inverse square law. Surface area was indeed important for increasing the parisitic capacitance. Interestingly voltage did not fall, but current did, when power fell at a distance. This may make sense if the parasitic capacitance is the main capacitance interacting with the dielectric antenna output. I wonder if voltage falls when other recievers are placed around the antenna, splitting the interaction with the antenna between them. That certainly seemed to happen when a hand was placed nearby the source antenna, becoming the main parasitic capacitance.

Also I came across something interesting recently which may be of use: spessartine garnet may outperform metglas at frequencies above 100 MHz, all the way up to GHz or further.

This is useful for my application, which requires a transparent but paramagnetic/ferromagnetic material.

Namaste,
Michael

Edit: I have found that gadolinium gallium garnet may be even better for my application, and is often made synthetically in optical quality crystals. There is a company in Boston that sells this material at a reasonable price, but you can also get it by mixing gallium oxide and gadolinium oxide powders and sintering around 700C with a blowtorch. The garnet particles can then be filtered out with a magnet, and the process can be repeated. It should also be possible to use the sol gel method by dissolving both metals in nitric acid, then lowering the PH with propylene glycol until the oxides precipitate as nanoparticles. That can be sintered with much higher yeild since diffusion does not limit the process.

Edit 2: I've given it a try with almandine, spessartine and paramagnetic diopside, and while the magnetic loss tangents of these paramagnetic materials were indeed much lower than those of metglas, their saturation magnetizations and permeabilities were nowhere near enough. some gadolinium(III) compound might still be able to do it, but I won't know till I test it. It looks like the best options are back to superparamagnets like nanoperm and very soft magnets like metglas though. Thankfully, it's actually quite easy to make superparamagnetic nanoparticles at home if you don't have access to the commercial materials like Metglas: there's tons of literature about it these days.

If the surplus energy only appears in superparamagnetic or near-superparamagnetic materials, it is possible that the energy comes from the Neel relaxation of the material, fueled by ambient thermal energy, which varies permeability parametrically to introduce energy into the electromagnetic system. This would explain reports of cooling instead of heating in time-energy-pump systems. This is probably why Naudin mentioned temperature as a possible source of the observed energy output. If this is true, it would be kind of similar to magnetocaloric materials - in fact I would be curious to see what would happen if a magnetocaloric material were used as the ferrite in a time energy pump running at a frequency similar in magnitude to the Neel relaxation time. This goes against a previous theory of mine, but always better to search for the truth rather than getting stuck in one way of thinking.

[MichaelZP]

Please can you compare the the impact on the propagation and absorption of dielectric fields between water and bismuth

[lukiepoole]

Watching your videos have sparked my memories. Can you do tests on electret? The Law of Attraction states that like and like attract, like and unlike repel.

Instead of traditional magnetic field which shows vortex vector equilibrium creates the illusion of attraction and repulsion. Where clockwise and clockwise creates repulsion, clockwise and counterclockwise creates attraction. Reproducible with two hands in the form of fists rotating opposite or same direction with each other.

My intuition told me static field is longitudinal instead of transverse - vortex manner.

I really would love to finally solve the mystery of like and like attract. All the repulsion effect produced by any brushed object is magnetic and never static. Static polarizes to become magnetic. This is the basic law of aether.

Electret however does not become magnetic due to the fact that it is organic in nature are NEVER metallic nor artificial polymers.

Electret and electret, electret and magnet.

'positive' side of electret with 'positive side of another electret, and the complement.

'positive' side of electret with 'south' side of magnet, as well as the complement.

+ & +, - & -, + & -
+ & S, + & N, - & S, - & N

+ is the 'positive' side of electret
- is the 'negative' side of electret
N is 'north' pole of magnet
S is 'south' pole of magnet.