Physics vs Metaphysics

Does science have all the answers? Is it simply a matter of time before science can answer all our most pressing questions about the nature of reality? Can physics suffice to explain everything without a metaphysics?

Bibliography
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. 1739. London: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1964.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Okasha, Samir. Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation Vol. 2 [1844]. Translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Schopenhauer. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Keywords: Science vs Philosophy

Sound: The Golden Present - Jesse Gallagher
Graphics: Maria,Thomas Meier, Space Space, Samphan Korwong, Joseph Redfield Nino, Engin Akyurt, Danilo Riba, Coverr-Free-Footage, Christian Bodhi, Andreas, Alexander Lutkov from Pixabay, eberhard grossgasteiger, Vimeo from Pexels

[Marbuss]

I cant help, but i want to qoute Hamlet to this:
“There are more things in Heaven and Earth, ..., than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

[orson_carte]

You dismiss Plato's theory of forms, and yet Schopenhaeur saw it's great relevance. The discovery in Physics, of many laws which have been found to be generally applicable, are thought by some to be indicative of Plato's forms, half way between 'what really is' to 'appearances'. That is, they give some insight into that world beyond