How Effective Was the early Ottoman Military?

How effective were the ottomans? Was it skill? Mass numbers? or It's Generals that gave it its strength.

Sources:
Ottoman Centuries by Lord Kinross
A military history of the ottomans by Mesut Uyar and Edward J Erickson
Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300-1774 by David Nicole and Angus Mcbride
The Janissaries by David Nicolle and Christa Hook
The Armies of Islam 7th-11th by David Nicolle Angus Mcbride
Lords of the Horizon by Jason Goodwin

[Abdullah_Khan]

An informative video, Love that background music 😏😏

[krimokrimov]

The reason for the strength of the Ottoman army was in its ability to mix the fighting style of the steppes of Eurasia represented by the mounted archers which the Turks had mastered well, with the fighting style of Europe, represented by the heavy cavalry with artillery and musketeers, the only thing missing for the Ottoman army was the pikemen

[Spartan_Disiplin]

7:14 Just right after that, Matthias Corvinus laid siege to Zvornik and most of his army drowned in the Sava River while fleeing from Mahmud Pasha's troops

[liveseldiesel]

bro dont quit more subscribers will come just think you have millions you deserve it

[BosphorusFloods]

Hello i have been watching your videos and following your channel for a couple of months now, can you please explain the importance of Sipahi compared to the Janisarries since i think the Sipahi's impact for the classical Ottoman army success is underrated.

[Spartan_Disiplin]

Ottoman casualties were 3, 000 in the siege of Belgrade(1456), essentially the same number as the Crusaders