Why Use HttpClientFactory Over HttpClient in .NET (Part 4)

preview_player
Показать описание

#coding #codingbootcamp #softwaredeveloper #codeyourfuture

Welcome back to StartupHakk! With my 25 years of development experience, here at StartupHakk we turn beginners into full-stack developers in just 3 months!

Today, we're diving into a critical comparison for .NET developers: HttpClient vs. HttpClientFactory. As you build your skills in the .NET environment, understanding the best tools and practices is essential. Let's explore why HttpClientFactory is often the superior choice over the traditional HttpClient.

Point 1: The Tale of HttpClient - A Cautionary Story
Once upon a time, in the land of .NET, developers used HttpClient to make web requests. It seemed simple and effective:

But as applications scaled, this approach led to several problems, like socket exhaustion and resource wastage, setting the stage for the need for a better solution.

Point 2: The Pitfalls of Direct HttpClient Usage
Using HttpClient directly has major drawbacks:

Socket Exhaustion: Each new HttpClient instance potentially leaves sockets in TIME_WAIT state, risking socket exhaustion.
Resource Wastage: Continuously creating and disposing HttpClient instances consumes considerable resources and degrades performance.
Inconsistent Configuration: Managing multiple HttpClient instances complicates applying uniform configurations and error handling across your application.

Point 3: The Heroic Entry of HttpClientFactory
.NET responded to these challenges with HttpClientFactory, designed to manage HttpClient instances efficiently. This approach helps avoid common pitfalls associated with direct HttpClient usage by offering better resource management and consistency across requests.

Point 4: Efficient Resource Management with HttpClientFactory
HttpClientFactory optimizes resource use by pooling HttpClient instances. This not only prevents socket exhaustion but also reduces the overhead associated with repeatedly creating and disposing of HttpClient instances.

Point 5: Ensuring Consistency and Resilience
HttpClientFactory allows centralized configuration of HttpClient instances, ensuring uniformity in headers, timeouts, and other policies. Integration with Polly for resilience strategies like retry policies and circuit breakers is streamlined, enhancing the robustness of your web requests.

Point 6: A Practical Adventure with HttpClientFactory
Let’s see HttpClientFactory in action:

This setup not only simplifies managing HttpClient configurations but also enhances application resilience by effectively handling transient faults.

So the moral of the story is - for .NET developers, choosing HttpClientFactory over HttpClient isn't just about avoiding technical pitfalls; it's about embracing best practices that ensure your applications are efficient, scalable, and resilient.

Рекомендации по теме
join shbcf.ru