HAMMOND M solo VS HAMMOND XK 4

preview_player
Показать описание
Buy Me a Coffee
#######################
ZBIERAMY NA NOWE KAMERY
#######################
JAKI INSTRUMENT WYBRAĆ? POMOGĘ!
#######################
Zacznij wspierać ten kanał, a dostaniesz te bonusy:
#######################
T-shirt
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I’ve had the M-Solo for a few months. For reference, I also have a B3 and XK3. Love the M. I like that there are no menus to wade through. The M is fun to play dynamically “live”, sounds good enough, and is so portable. The key action is fine. If I could change things: add Leslie connector, use standard power cord, optional Leslie half moon, waterfall keys for looks.

FYI the Vox and Farfisa modes are a really good bonus.

danp.
Автор

Sounds pretty close to me . . .How is the action on the M-Solo? I know for the size and weight they have to have synth keys not waterfall, but wondering if the action is ok

PianoTone
Автор

I have the Hammond xk1 and its still going strong 2 yrs i also have a Roland VK-7 as my top manual i use dual Neo Vents Mark 1 and Mark 2 for both. Simular to what u have there. Are u using a type of amp to get that sound or is it str8 from both the M and XK4?

danaowens
Автор

They both have the same sound engine, no? I am a Hammond C3 player, please, tell me how the action is on these clones? How close to Hammond feel?

Bowruss
Автор

They sound the same to me... but the XK4 would allow tons of customizations to the sound.

SLHkeyboards
Автор

Prefer the M Solo! I have an XK5/ XLK5 at home. For gigs I use an SK1 through mini vent. Had an SK Pro 61 but didn’t like it so went back to SK1. M Solo might be a good buy!

stewartmaxwell
Автор

I own XK1, XK5 and am waiting for the arrival of my M-Solo. Why the M-Solo? 2 words : 8 LBS

shawno
Автор

The smallest organ i ever brought home. Under my left arm. In the box. Burgundy 😊

tom
Автор

W tej ostatniej partii to nawet Solo miał głębsze brzmienie 😉
A ja sobie właśnie nabyłem klonika Hammonda w postaci Yamaha Reface YC za jedyne 1600 PLN i ma w zasadzie bardzo podobne brzmienie przy, oczywiście, sporych ograniczeniach funkcjonalnych. Pozdrawiam 🖐️

--Kwinto--
Автор

I have an sk1 and hate the key action…. What’s the new pro like and is it the same sound as the 4?

musicplacenz
Автор

I ordered the XK4 and after 2 hours boxed it back up and returned it..to fucking complicated and difficult to make sense of it..the manual was useless...you try to do something and there is fine print under the so called paragraph or pic that tells you to look elsewhere in the manual..and you can't find that anyway..see, my Studiologic Numa 2 is natural, easy to adjust, has a great leslie sim, the built in percussion is really nice although the soft percussion is a little vague sounding but that's it...the XK4 was a disappointment to me..but tht's just me. I been a B-3 player since 1966..

sandmandm
Автор

Why does the m-solo not have SUSTAIN??

moogy
Автор

I DREAM ? A BAD DREAM
What's hapen in Suzuki about the sourcing of the XK4 made in china ? Incredible and not serious.
What would tell Laurence Hammond.
It's a very great mistake.

MPOMusicPartnersOrganisation
Автор

XK-4 has better sound quality than M-solo. It sounds more natural. However, M-solo is more compact.
Perhaps, the difference in analog circuits and power supplies is what causes that.

cozy
Автор

Pointless comparison, since both feature the same sound engine. 🤷🏻‍♂️

KBpro
Автор

Don't waste you money on these Suziki nightmares...buy A Numa II Organ it's fucking perfect...just like a B-3 ...without the bullshit to wade thru...the Leslie Sim is perfect..run it in stereo..you'll be glad you did. Leave this shit for the geeks who don't know what a B-3 sounds like..as for me, I been playing Hammond since 1967...I do know what a B-3 is supposed to sound like and I know how to play it !!!

sandmandm