Russia Unveiled its First Robot Army That will CONFRONT the US

preview_player
Показать описание
** ROAD TO 850,000 SUBSCRIPTIONS ***



CLICK THE BELL! 🔔

CONTACT ME
➡️ Snapchat: MrLboyd
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The robot learned how to shoot. They still working on teaching him how to reload...

ANDRIY_H
Автор

LOL😂😂😂😂
Half of what is shown is considered Kringe even here in Russia.
Experience shows that the most effective "Robots"
are strike drones, And Self-Propelled draft Vehicles with supplies.👍

Lord_Cointoss
Автор

I call BS. If you're going to make a robot army, why make it in human form and human size? Imagine an army of hexapods robots the size of medium sized dogs, with various interchangable weapon mounts. That would be far more dangerous, and much harder to fight against than an andriod.

magicalminty
Автор

I'm not an American, I'm Russian actually, and I can tell you that the American capitalist economy has much more productive and technological power to produce this sort of things. This on the video is but one government-sponsored factory, somewhere near Moscow probably. In America, there are dozens and hundreds of companies competing and producing this stuff. Look at Boston Dynamics for example. But keep going with you communism and you'll end up in a similar place.

alexshapiro
Автор

If the humanoid robot falls over, it needs to be able to get back up again, my guess is the "push-ups" sequence is a portion of the "get back up from a prone position" sequence.

PlasteredDragon
Автор

I was going to make a joke about how the next big conflict would be Pay-to-Win but I realized it's always been that way...

notmymind
Автор

The part that scares me is when this stuff gets used for police and against civilians, drones with guns and stuff, then civilians make their own makeshift ones... all the tech is there, easy to get today.

It's only a matter of time before armored and Air combat will be pretty much automated, maybe there will be a human controlling it from some distant bases, but the worst thing to lose in a fight is the experience of the soldiers, planes and tanks are way cheaper to make both in time and money than a trained human.

Who wins is who can make the other side give up whatever they want to keep or take.

And yes, it's called a war of attrition, like ww1 was... Germany had a ton of people, but no resources to keep building the machines to keep the humans fighting.

AKATenn
Автор

New York City already has robotic dogs that are armed capable. They’ve had them for the past three years.

mamaalaska
Автор

America "firearms for self defense bad" Russia " here's a robot dog with a RPG"

PrinceTravis
Автор

I really wish you'd filter out these requests to improve the profile of Russian information campaigns.

deegee
Автор

As Bane once said to Batman : "Powerful tricks for the uninitiated. But we ARE initiated, aren't we?"

That's a truly pathetic display. First off, as evidenced even by the current conflict in Ukraine, Russians can't even fire a regular missile without accidentally hitting themselves. Are they trying to convince me, they suddenly have more advanced technology, than Boston Dynamics and Raytheon put together? Seriously?

Secondly, someone is also trying to tell me, that Russians have found some magical way to make such a robotic army financially viable? Come again?
There have been multiple reports of russian forces in Ukraine using small arms literally taken from museums - Mosin Nagant rifles, SKS and such. They don't even have enough of their legendary AKs, and those, that they have are old, rusty, beaten up, without modern accessories as red-dots or laser pointers. Guess why?
Because right after cold war old russian generals and former KGB agents saw a market opening up, and they've contributed to illegal arms dealing, by selling most of the army stocks to people like Wiktor But (portrayed by N. Cage as "Yuri Orlov" in the film "Lord Of War" from 2005).
What are they going to fund such a robotic army with? Potatoes?😆

Next thing is, that building such a "combat robot" is not as easy, as one would think. You know, I'm a fan of Battletech universe. Some people could ask, why nobody ever tried to build such a "battlemech", like Mackie, Atlas, hell - even a Flea. Because with current technology, that "could" be more or less possible. Yet, nobody does that. Why?
Because it's pointless.

In real life, nobody cares about a weapon, that is "cool" or "badass". A usable "weapon" (which includes combat vehicles, mobile cannons, missiles, drones et c.) has to be:
- powerful (obviously), meaning it has to be significantly more useful than comparable, existing weapon systems,
- resistant, resilient, hard to track down, aim at, difficult to be damaged/destroyed,
- as cheap to manufacture as possible,
- ergonomic,
- cheap AND easy to repair and maintain, ESPECIALLY in the field, in absence of specialized facilities,
- and so on...

Typical "battlemech" is a walking tower of steel. Even a blind person would hit that... Now, do you know, how hard is to develop a vehicle, that WALKS? Humans have to learn, how to walk. It's a real hell to make a machine, that would be able to walk like a human, sprint or jump. As of now, Boston Dynamics has the best results and even though - their bipedal robots still often walk like a drunk babies. A couple of decades ago that wouldn't be even possible at all, because of all the computing power, that's needed for that.
Moving on, imagine this bipedal mech in a variety of environments, trying to walk on ice (remember, how much does it weigh), sand dunes or rock debris... You get the picture. Imagine its joints getting in constant contact with water or sand and dust.
Now, compare such 'mech to a standard tank.
Currently, there's no better way to move around variety of terrain types, than treads. Especially, if your vehicle needs to be heavily armored. You can't put very heavy armor on a vehicle with wheels, 'cause it would collapse under its own mass. Physics, basically. With treads, you can also do a 180 degree turn, while remaining basically in the same spot. Next on, note that a good tank is as "flat" as possible - minimizing its profile makes it harder to hit, simply. Shoot a leg off of a 'mech, and it's done for. You don't have to destroy it completely; it's still not going anywhere.
So as you can see, there's a reason, why tanks are main battle vehicles, not some sci-fi "battlemechs".

Note I was talking about "battlemechs", meaning still just vehicles, piloted by human soldier(s). Now, think how much harder is to make an autonomous ROBOT soldier, that - apart of costly hardware and spare parts - requires enormous computing power, needed not only for everything, that current armed vehicles need (offensive and defensive systems, specialized optics, electronic warfare systems, friend-or-foe identification systems et c.), but also for things like walking, moving, handling weapon (not just shooting, but also reloading, clearing jams et c.), situational awareness, seeing, hearing and most importantly - communicating, so they can receive and obey orders as well as co-operate.
That's such a tall order, not even US in cooperation with other NATO countries would be able to pull that off as of now.

And you're trying to tell me, that Russians can? Well, there have to be then some "other" Russians in the world, I've never heard about before🤣

Also, such a robot army would be horribly ineffective, considering investments and maintenance costs. Even modern tanks can be disabled with a simple bag of cement to the vents, because their engines still need to "breathe". No need for fancy anti-tank missiles (obviously, that's situational). I mean, anyone can come up with a hundred methods of disabling/destroying such robots using the most primitive means. Dig a deep enough hole/trench - they won't be able to come out. They're heavy - lure them to sand/thin ice/swamp. Destroy their optical sensors with bright flash. Fill the frequencies with random noise to jam their communications, since this would be their only means of communicating with HQ and each other (forget about "talking" robots from Star Wars or "Chappie", we're not talking about sci-fi). Shoot/spray them with graphite and/or highly magnetic ammo to screw their electronics and cause shortings in their electrical installation.
You can wreck a billion-dollars robot army with virtually anything you can get your hands on.
Pit a thousand of these russian robots agains one ADS, Areal Denial System, which is basically a microwave antenna on a humvee. You would just need to amp that output a bit up, but that's not really a problem. Say goodbye to this army. International conventions only apply to humans, so you can fry all these robots at will, all at once.
Not to mention, that a thousand of unsuspecting young men, forcefully drawn into army is still (and always will be) a much cheaper investment, than even ONE of these robots...

JanKowalski-rdyb
Автор

how they gonna have a robot army when they cant even make enough tanks to fight the war they are currently losing

AvengedJokers
Автор

right now Russia getting its teeth kicked in LOL

jamesray
Автор

This being Russia I have a difficult time taking their word for things like this.

strokinit
Автор

There is one russian invention that is relevant in this discussion - Potemkin Village. Which is exactly what their robotics program is.

slavshuravesky
Автор

Lfmao😂 uses tanks from WWII in Ukraine yet they build what ??? Hahahaha get real mate 😂😂😂😂 don’t propagate just crap from RuZZia, Slava Ukraini ❤

MaksAMD
Автор

Remote controlled robots cannot operate if they can't communicate with their operators. Once it is established which frequencies they transmit in, they will be jammed.

Remote vehicles suffer the same issues as meat driven vehicles - FPV drones can approach them from their blind spots and exploit their weak spots. The war in Ukraine has proven the Russian, German, and US tanks are all vulnerable to drone strikes. The difference is the US crew is more likely to walk away after their tank is disabled.

timmooney
Автор

Let's be honest one of those moves slightly and the rest are shells. Take the armada tank for example, all the hype ... 2 working examples.

EdWolfram
Автор

Since these things are basically drones, we have anti-drone guns that basically disconnect and turn off the drone, these won’t be as useful or scary as you would think

gnurtssf
Автор

that robot dog is something out of a horror movie!

GrandmasterTao