Set Identities (Part 1)

preview_player
Показать описание
Discrete Mathematics: Set Identities
Topics discussed:
1) Identity laws.
2) Domination laws.
3) Idempotent laws.

Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]

#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #SetTheory #SetIdentities
  1. Neso Academy
  2. set identities
  3. set identities discrete mathematics
  4. discrete mathematics set identities
  5. domination laws
  6. idempotent laws
Рекомендации по теме
Set Identities (Part 0:06:45

Set Identities (Part 1)

Set Identities in 0:20:52

Set Identities in Discrete Math

Discrete Math - 0:11:29

Discrete Math - 2.2.2 Set Identities

Set Identities Part 0:07:33

Set Identities Part 1

Using Set Identities 0:04:19

Using Set Identities

Using Set Identities 0:08:27

Using Set Identities

How to do 0:16:30

How to do a PROOF in SET THEORY - Discrete Mathematics

Set Identities (Part 0:07:57

Set Identities (Part 2)

Set Identities (Algebra 0:08:57

Set Identities (Algebra of Sets)

Discrete Math - 0:17:49

Discrete Math - 2.2.3 Proving Set Identities

Sets: Set Identities 0:08:49

Sets: Set Identities

Set Identities 0:11:44

Set Identities

Set Identities 0:10:52

Set Identities

Discrete Math 2.2.2 0:09:52

Discrete Math 2.2.2 Set Identities

Sets 5 / 0:09:43

Sets 5 / set identities

Set Operations (Union, 0:43:03

Set Operations (Union, Intersection, Complement and Difference) and Set Identities

Discrete Math 2.2.3 0:17:42

Discrete Math 2.2.3 Proving Set Identities

Discrete mathematics : 0:08:24

Discrete mathematics : - ( Set Identities ) - 20.

Set Identities 0:06:22

Set Identities

Discrete mathematics : 0:04:36

Discrete mathematics : - ( Sets ; Membership table of distributive property ) - 21.

Set Identities in 0:20:32

Set Identities in Bulk

Discrete Structures: Set 0:14:31

Discrete Structures: Set Theory -- Proofs Using Set Identities

Discrete Mathematics - 0:19:51

Discrete Mathematics - Module 1 - 4. Set Identities

Set Identities 0:11:09

Set Identities

Комментарии
Автор

5:01
First line of proof b) has the union symbol instead of the intersection symbol.

dorian
Автор

Download other videos quickly so that I can complete my university syllabus in this year.plz add all videos in this year

sarmisthasahoo
Автор

Question 9
A statistics department at Wagoroko Company studied product preferences of 20, 000
consumers. It was found that each of the products A, B, C was liked by 7020, 6230, and 5980
respectively and all products were liked by 1500; products A and B were liked by 2580,
products A and C were liked by 1200 and products B and C were liked by 1950. The head of
Statistics department was promptly fired by the Manager of the company. Why Manager of
Wagoroko Company made this decision?
Q

SEVERINMSANGI
Автор

Question 9
A statistics department at Wagoroko Company studied product preferences of 20, 000
consumers. It was found that each of the products A, B, C was liked by 7020, 6230, and 5980
respectively and all products were liked by 1500; products A and B were liked by 2580,
products A and C were liked by 1200 and products B and C were liked by 1950. The head of
Statistics department was promptly fired by the Manager of the company. Why Manager of
Wagoroko Company made this decision?
Plz help me

SEVERINMSANGI
Автор

What a epic vedio amazing and very knowledgeable 💙💙🤘 thanks 🙏

shyamdixit
Автор

I don't remember you defining what "T" and "F" are here that you use.
Aren't you supposed to be careful with the use of T in first order logic ? Isn't that what leads to contradictions as described by Tarski in his undefinability theorem ?

MrGustavier
Автор

how can we know that we have to put which of the symbol And, Or ???

EMANHASSAN-xz
Автор

i am a little confused about the second proof regarding the domination laws because you said that “we know that TRUE or with anything is always TRUE” but isn’t that the thing you were trying to prove? please explain this to me i can’t quite wrap my head around it.

sarahbuxton