DLSS vs PICTURE QUALITY #shorts #pc #nvidia #dlss

[reviewforthetube]

So using the quality and balanced is amazing and people should utilize it. I agree dont use ultra but balanced gives such a maasive boost without actuslly reducing image quality to the human eye not using quality or balanced doesnt even make sense anymore. Its to damn good lol

[GamesZeroPlay]

but if you think that he is upscaling a much lower resolution, it is very impressive

[paulcox]

You have to pixel peep in order to see differences and you usually get about 50% more frames, so really it's not even close.

There is some bias as if native is a gold standard, but once you apply TAA or FXAA, which are really blur filters, it's not like it's not altered too.

If you use no AA, the jaggies and shimmering even in 4k can be more distracting than any errors from DLSS or even FSR sometimes and again, DLSS is actually IMPROVING the framerate, not taking away from it like anti-aliasing normally does.

Companies are pushing hard into DLSS and FSR because it really is a truly next gen solution to the problem of jaggies and shimmering.

If we could have used artificial intelligence to render images before the last few years, we would have. It's a step forwards, not backwards.