Artie from Cruella scene pack [1080p] + mega link

Показать описание

(the mega link has longer scenes and more sound sorry)

I saw that no ones made one of these yet for him and I don't know if there is even a demand for this character but I love him.

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

"I'm Artie or Art as in 'work of'."
I love his introduction so much.

boyfangirl

Best dialogue of #Cruella was:

Artie: Mmm. What do I get?

Cruella: A night of fabulousness and mayhem and possible death.

Artie: Check, check, not quite sure about the death thooo.

Cruella: It won’t be you.

Artie: Mmm. I’ll get my coat.

Jeanalexandre_

This is Disney's truly first out and proud LGBTQ character and I love it and him. Also, in my opinion, I think he's a good representation of the LGBTQ community. I don't know what crap they tried to pull with Le Fou, but it obviously didn't work.

christopherorta

he really seems to like the cheetah print….so Cruella and Artie both like spots!

lastgirl

Artie: hmm, i get some insults but NORMAL is the cruellest of insults but i don't hear that
Me: words to live by👏🏻

Sunday-ud

wow...thank you for this stunning two minutes of representation Disney...he really had a character arc....

fredgwynn

“Mommy and daddy are fighting” kills me all the time I love Artie😂❤️❤️

m_elanyy

THANK YOU I WAS LOOKING FOR SOME AND THERE WASN'T ANY AND THIS ONE IS SO GOOD QUALITY 😫😫

maripollo

I love Artie so much he’s such a great character and I want a spin off series.

michaelmark

I've been looking EVERYWHERE for this

teboihiralte

Everybody's talking 'bout Artie 😳

keitha.

JUST WHEN I DOWLOADED THE MOVIE I FIND A GOOD SCENEPACK

lupintonks_

Ngl he was one of my favorite characters in the movie. Possibly _the_ favorite.

WJen

THANK YOU SO MUCH, YOU HELPED A LOT😭💘

heartsgls

Okay...THIS. All of this. It is awesome and I can't praise it enough. This whole movie is a masterpiece and an example of how to do stuff RIGHT. Big caveat first - skip it if you want.

Let's be crystal clear on something - I don't mind more female, more person of color and more LGBT (or any combination thereof) characters in movies. What I do mind, especially given that I'm a writer myself (previous project I worked on was about a female sniper who has a daughter-father relationship with a male, asexual cybernetic soldier with a feminine aesthetic and mannerisms, so if anyone wants to have a kneejerk reaction to my comment and accuse me of bigotry...sorry, your accusation has no basis in reality), is lazy writing where you have these cardboard cutout characters with little to no personality that exist solely to be a token representation of a particular group. It's a very cheap, lazy, sycophantic and disingenuous way for writers to wash their hands and act like they care about a particular group, when they really don't. Because if you actually respect the groups of people you're trying to represent in your story...you won't write them as placeholder tokens. You'll write them as people with personalities. Women don't begin and end with their sex. People of color don't begin and end with their ethnicity. LGBT people don't begin and end with their sexuality. A character without a personality who's female, POC or LGBT is just as boring as a character without a personality who's male, white and straight. This is what I complain about, when I shit on movies like "Charlie's Angels" (2019) or "The Ghostbusters" (2016) or "Captain Marvel" (2019). Representation and diversity are not a bad thing, but they cannot save a story with no substance, and woe unto any writer who believes otherwise. They complain about sexism, racism and homophobia, when their movie is not well-received, but that's just a cheap attempt to avoid admitting that they hardly tried to write a story that was worth it. People don't mind the representation and diversity - you just suck at doing it. That's why "Charlie's Angels" flopped and "Alita: Battle Angel" was well-received by male audiences - people can't wait for the sequel. Because it has an intriguing story, a protagonist we want to succeed and a lot of nuance, instead of a Mary-Sue female protagonist (whose proficiency in certain fields is not conveyed well and it just comes off as plot convenient and nothing else) in a world of one-dimensional males who exist solely to be assholes...with the occasional timid "feminist ally" stereotype character in the mix. "Man bad, woman good" - that's "Charlie's Angels" in a nutshell.

"Cruella" is an example of how to do it CORRECTLY, to have a story that's engaging, AND has a diverse cast while it's at it. That's how you do it. You have to have substance. You can't write a stale, unengaging story and go "but at least the cast is real diverse". No. That's not art works. This is a story about empowerment and rediscovering yourself, the main character is female, some of the characters who were originally white are now people of color (Anita is black, Roger is Iranian-British - it's not a continuity error, as this movie, contrary to what many believe, is NOT a prequel to "101 Dalmatians". It's a reiteration and it exists completely independently in its own cinematic universe. There's a sequel already in the making and it's not gonna be a re-hash of the "101 Dalmatians" story. I can tell you that right now. This Cruella is not that Cruella) and one of the friends of the main characters is LGBT. A bigoted person wouldn't like this movie, but an objective viewer who just wants a story that's worth their while...most certainly would.
Estella/Cruella is a far cry from her original iteration (if anything, the role of that character as a narcissistic manipulator is filled by the Baroness in this movie), and that's a good thing. The story bears similarity to "The Devil Wears Prada" (2006), but it is different enough that it doesn't feel like a cheap re-hash of the same concept - I like "Cruella" way better than I do TDWP. It adds plenty of new things and its existence is warranted. I, for one, am very glad that this movie exists.
Roger and Anita bear similarities to their original counterparts, but they are also different in many regards and they're both likable, charismatic characters. The change made regarding their ethnicity does not feel like cheap pandering, because they're not knock-off imitations, pale shadows of the originals. It feels natural and it's yet another thing that shows that...no, these are not the same people as the couple we know from the original story and this does not happen in the same universe.
And then we get to Artie. Apart from being LGBT, he's really...a brand new character. He doesn't have an original version like Cruella, Jasper, Horace, Roger and Anita do, for example. So...there's not really anything to compare him to. It would've been really easy to make him into a token character that merely helps progress the plot, but thankfully, he's a very well-written character. He has personality and he doesn't feel shoe-horned into the story, just because. For starters, Estella/Cruella becoming friends with him is very natural and flows well with the story. She is a girl with a passion for designing with a taste for the extravagant, who loves to make a statement and rebel against society, and he's a queer, flamboyant clothes shop owner. They have mutual interests that serve as the foundation for that friendship. It makes sense why Estella/Cruella knows Artie, why they're friends/allies and why she sought his assistance - because he's in the know when it comes to fashion and can help her out with tailoring outfits, and his line of work also makes sense as to why he would have the skills for it in the first place. He doesn't just pop up out of nowhere into the story to do stuff that Jasper and Horace cannot. Some people complained about him not having much screen time, but I don't think that's a valid complaint. Quality over quantity. Artie is the kind of character who's interesting in a way that even when the movie doesn't show you something, or he doesn't appear in many scenes, you kind of put 2 and 2 together yourself. He's kind of like the Wasteland bandits in "Cyborg" (1989) or...Miss Floom in "Babe: Pig In The City" (1998):
The bandits, judging not only by their camo clothing, but also their behavior and movement tactics, are very strongly hinted to be ex-military. When we first see Miss Floom, she's holding a napkin, wiping her reddened nose and speaking with a nasally voice - likely an allergy to all these animals she's illegally harboring over at her hotel. A similar thing is the case with Artie:
2:12 When Horace faces off against one of the Baroness' guards, a particularly large and burly guy, he punches him in the face...but to no avail. Artie then roundhouse kicks the guy on the back of the head, knocking him out. Given that Artie is a queer male in 1970s England, it's quite likely that he has been bothered on the streets by hoodlums or rude people, which would necessitate at least a moderate skill in self-defense on his part - hence his ability to deliver such a precise kick. His feminine mannerisms and look would likely cause a potential attacker to make the incorrect assumption that he's timid, defenseless and weak, which would then promptly result in a warranted ass-kicking. Sometimes, the movie doesn't have to hold your hand and explain you the details - it lets you figure them out for yourself. Subtle, not overt.
For the love of all that's good and right, THIS is what I wanna see in stories with more representation and more diverse casts. Characters that the viewer can root for, are interesting and have personalities. I want more movies like "Cruella", "Gunpowder Milkshake" and "Alita: Battle Angel". Is that so much to ask for, nowadays? Just plain old GOOD WRITING? Because diverse/representative movies are not something new. People just...tried harder to write something worthwhile, back in the day. That's why "Aliens", despite being a female empowerment movie, is a cult classic, and why "Man Of The Year" (1995 - the movie with Dirk Shafer (RIP), not the one with Robin Williams (RIP)), despite being a mockumentary, is one of the best pro-LGBT films to be ever made. Because the characters in these movies feel human and relatable - we want to root for them. Even if their struggle is not something you've personally felt, you can understand how and why they are the way they are, their motivations, their behavior. When the story is engaging, most people won't mind the representation of a particular group.

petervitkov