Explaining the logic behind Parmenides’ view that there is only One Thing.

[PriscaTheologian]

The All. Parmenides and Heroclitus; I’m enjoying their works right now. Indeed, that which Socrates admitted to not understanding in the ladder’s works is simplistically complicated and vice versa. Such is the interplay of mentalism, vibration, gender and polarity.

[sergiosatelite]

Thanks for sharing. Parmenides doesn’t get enough credit. Just curious: why couldn’t there be two infinite things happening at once? Mathematicians talk about smaller and greater infinities, which was completely beyond my imagination before I heard of that. Just as my mind was blown when I heard two parallel lines can intersect if we switch to non-Euclidian geometry. So, why not two infinite things happening at once? Maybe just in two separate realities? Or even same reality as long as the two infinite things are of different, non-mutually exclusive natures? (Like, maybe infinite space and infinite time)? Just a thought/inquiry. Thanks for providing food for thought.