One Blows Away the Competition! ... SkyTrak ST+ vs Garmin R10

In this video, I'm comparing the SkyTrak+ vs. Garmin R10. I'll be discussing the pros and cons of each system, and which one is the best for you.

⚡️ Hit #Subscribe & #HitTheBell so you don't miss out on any new videos!

⚡️Become a FREE SUBSCRIBER to GOLFERS AUTHORITY now

Connect with Paul Liberatore

[Poldolot]

Probably R10 was not aligned properly (left biased). Please use shot by shot details in Awesome Golf to compare club data. Great comparison, awaiting the next one with these units!

[irasnyder]

Hey, thx for shooting this video. I really liked seeing the comparison. I'm an R10 and awesome golf user myself. two comments if you if you shoot another head to head. 1/ I wonder if your R10 was pointed 3 degrees to the left. and if moved if you'd have seen the ball flight more closely follow the ST+ results. just a guess. 2/ would love to see the details page in Awesome Golf. I wonder how close the face-to-path numbers matched the ST+. In general the overall results looked great and the units are generally close (using the RCT ball).

[RolandDobbins]

Suggest checking the R10 alignment, & using the detailed view in Awesome Golf.

R10 is more portable & cheaper, but requires more space. For most people, R10 is the right answer.

I ordered the Skytrak+ solely to save space in my semi-open carport. I’ll keep the R10 to take to the range, & on the road.

[charlesjeter]

Honestly the R10 is the only unit that is priced appropriately. The rest are out of control. As long as it picks up my shot shapes and is with in 5 yards I’m happy! I can use the range to really dial in my yardage.

[JorgeMorales-dopr]

Great video, exactly I was thinking. Please let us know how the numbers on club path, face to path face to target

[kenmancinelli]

Does the R10 have club path and face angle?

[garrysutcliffe]

Why dont you compare the path and club face on the r10 compared to the skytrak

[OMG-]

Thanks for the comparison, I had to return my R10, due to lack of enough room from unit to net. What about short game, chipping, pitching, putting? I know the R10 does not have putting, how about SkyTrak+ and how close are both units on short shots 20-30yds in? These shots make up 30% of sim play and 60% of my practice so for me it is vital the units provide good data to dial in the wedges.

[ScottBarton-irjz]

SkyTrack+ is the real deal! Thanks for your review. Keep the videos coming! They're super helpful!

[MoAntphonyMo]

Can you compare the R10 to the new Swingcaddie SC4. Been hearing good things about it!

[JorgeMorales-dopr]

Is anyway you can show the club path and face to path numbers in this review . Just to see what is the difference with the new skytrak+ feature.

[guapip]

Could you please do a video on shot shape comparison for the mevo+ against higher end units? Really interested to know if it's a worthwhile upgrade from the r10.

[mpkelley]

You said reliable club data. Did you compare to another LM that has club data to compare? Just curious how accurate it really is considering even Quad requires stickers. And these two are really not a great comparison due to price difference as it is huge. But appreciate you showing them. How is putting with Skytrak in sim play?

[John-eiuz]

Nice comparison. I think with the higher price of the SK+ you are buying peace of mind more than anything else. The R10 does get it right most of the time but sometimes it also gets it horribly wrong. Carry distance on the R10 is very good and backspin seems to be ok too if using the RCT ball. The problem is that golfers very rarely hit an OB by hitting the ball too far compared to slicing or hooking it OB. This is where I lose confidence in my R10. It is still however the best unit out there for the price and that's still good enough for me at my level. Once I become a single digit HC player I will consider spend a couple of thousand dollars in order to improve my game even more but that's not going to happen anytime soon I think. The MLM2Pro could exceed the R10 and be the best for that price range in the future but it seems to have too many connection issues and doesn't pick up short chip shots yet. Once it does I might consider buying that but the SK+ is just a bit too pricey for me. Does anyone know how the SK+ is able to measure club data accurately without stickers on the club face?

[derekchaplin]

Can you give us insight into when you’ll be able to test it outdoors? There seems to be tremendous interest in this topic from your last video and you are the only person releasing info on this new product 🙏🏻.

[paulsbox]

Mlm2 vs skytrak comparison, both have photo and radar tech. It would be a better comparison.

[peters]

R10 is impressive for the price. The ST+ is worth it if you want the best accuracy and club data, which is huge for game improvement.

[Nate]

Great video. Would love to see a review of the BLP vs. Skytrak+ comparing accuracy, game improvement functionality, and simulator software courses and graphics.

[mattsolomon]

You have better launch monitors…why would you compare the St to a r10?? R10 is a toy, a launch monitor at best but you can’t depend on shot shape at all as you show.
That same facility probably has gc Hawk or uneekor overhead…how did the st+ do against them?

[gilbloomer]

Do you really need all those extra bells and whistles plus all the extraneous useless data with the SR+? Personally, I think the R10 provides all the data that the majority of us golfers require. Just my opinion.