China's 'Long March 9' Is Going To DOMINATE the Space Industry!

China's 'Long March 9' Is Going To DOMINATE the Space Industry!

In this exciting video, we unveil the incredible potential of China's 'Long March 9' rocket, set to dominate the space industry. 🚀 Get ready for an epic journey through the future of space exploration as we explore the capabilities and innovations of this game-changing rocket. From payload capacity to interstellar missions, this video covers it all. Join us as we embark on a space odyssey like never before!
Don't miss out on the latest developments in space technology. Subscribe now for more space-related content and stay updated with the future of space exploration!

Timecodes
00:00 - Intro
00:48 - Background
02:29 - STARSHIP vs LONG MARCH 9
04:41 - DESIGN AND CAPABILITIES
07:08 - REUSABILITY
08:10 - SENDING FIRST CHINESE MAN TO THE MOON

#nasa #spacex #china

[AlexTWChang]

Chinese's GPS is not named "Baidu" but "Beido" which meant the major 7 stars in constellation of "Ursa Major". These 7 starts formed a shape of ancient Chinese compass (or ladle) which always pointed out the north direction.

[ivanfreely]

China's drive to make space exploration more economical will dominate the industry. If the LM-9 becomes a reality, I doubt the LM-9 will remain top dog for long. The US had the Saturn V rockets that dominated the industry until the Soviet Union gave up. However, I'm more interested in their EM catapult launched space shuttle / plane (forgot it's name) project.

[_aullik]

yes the Long March 9 concept is one massive rocket, and it is certainly better than anything Europe has (planed). But at the same time far behind SpaceX current plans. It also does not look half as achievable.

The animation with the lower stage + boosters returning to earth makes little sense. If you have boosters you would drop them as refurbishing solid rocket boosters is not cost efficient and returning them means your rocket is now about twice as heavy so a lot harder to land. Specially since you showed the SRBs detaching at 3:36. In general SRBs make no sense on a reusable lower stage. This btw is the reason ULA is only recovering the engines (if it works) and not the rest of the lower stage as their use of SRBs makes recovery impractical.

Chinas concept for the LM9 (or correctly CZ9) is modeled heavily on Starship. They basically try to copy as much as they can. If they develop an expendable version first with the boosters they gonna have a hard time adopting that to reusability. Thus i really question their timeline.

The SpaceX Starship only makes sense if they get orbital refueling to work.


In general, the pictures/videos you show have very little to do with what you talk about.

[ГеоргиБонджов]

140T to LEO for LM-9 is too old information. I hope next video to be updated with actual data about planned capabilities of this rocket.

[brockgrace]

I was going to say, " no, no it's not "

[jamieflame]

Lol no not in the wildest politburo fantasy is China anywhere near that competency.

[rodbihari]

2;55 Still saying musks failing rocket is the best. You are obviously american. So musk has a rocket that uses 1950s tech, kerosine and O2, that doesnt go any higher than low earth orbit, and thats a world leader ?