ROBBERY?!! Who REALLY Won? (Gilbert Burns vs Khamzat Chimaev)

preview_player
Показать описание
Here we will end the debate on who won in the fight Khamzat Chimaev vs Gilbert Burns.

___________________________________________________________________________

📱Follow me📱

📧Business Inquiries📧
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I feel like Burns is the only fighter in that top 10 that Khamzat would not attempt to take down because of his BJJ. If he fought Colby he would absolutely attempt the TDs more. He would also ragdoll Jorge.

katzenjammer
Автор

Most modern "Robberies" are when someone's favourite fighter won, or when someone's least liked fighter won. It was a close fight, being swung to either fighter by an edge isn't a robbery.

supersardonic
Автор

Chimaev not only went the distance but took multiple of Burns hardest shots thus answering all of your questions about cardio and durability. it was a tough fight but it shows Chimaev came to the UFC a top five fighter easily and that is what a fight between elite fighters looks like.

justinlassiter
Автор

I like how a lot of people on youtube point to your break downs to settle arguments about who really won. Of course their are plenty that say weasle gets it wrong but its kinda hard to do a better breakdown than frame by frame, shot by shot. I love these man 👍

TSyoyo
Автор

anyone who calls a really really close fights like this a robbery needs to watch another sport

ramonsalazar
Автор

And i still don't hear any mention of Khamzat beat Burns during Ramadan? Khamzat had been fasting for 10 days before he fought burns. That's pretty impressive

gyateste
Автор

I like these breakdowns about the number of strikes and the strength of each one. As when I watch the fights, I mostly look for the big attacks that give the crowd a reaction so we tend to miss the smaller strikes. 💪

AcidGlow
Автор

Really great breakdown and when you explained about the judging system, I understood how the final outcome came to be. Thanks!

Smith.JohnSmith
Автор

TheWeasle, this was such a great breakdown dude, this was needed because what most people understand but a lot don't, you're attempting to be AS OBJECTIVE AS POSSIBLE, no emotion clouding judgment but judging every strike and exchange objectively and following the rules to the best tee you can. Khamzat won, but that is definitely FOTY thus far

mathprodigy
Автор

Great breakdown of the third round. I would really like to see a rematch of these two for 5 rounds. We know it would be another great fight.

enthaa
Автор

Great explanation of this fight. It was so close and after watching this I went and watched it 2 more times and I agree with. This is the best explanation I’ve ever heard on doing a breakdown of a very close fight.

davesharpe
Автор

Damn. I really thought Burns won with those three overhands....wow that was much closer than I thought! Well done bringing clarity to this fight Weasle!!!

kiwicoproductions
Автор

First time watching this fight before the decision was called I thought Burns might have won. 2nd time I could see how Chimaev edged out the decision. Either way this fight was a straight banger. Respect to both men.

lowkeysoundsystem
Автор

Jones had Gustafsson
GSP had Matt Hughes
Anderson had Sonnen
Adesanya had Gastelum
Khamzat had Burns
Nobody is invincible Khamzat still has a bright future

richart
Автор

What an incredible breakdown!!! You always answer every possible fan question in your vids.

Absolutely definitive. The way you ended this one was beautiful.

Draw, but if we apply this rule, then the winner is.

Thank you for your hard work!!

I hope that you make tons of money from YouTube and your channel explodes, because you deserve it, are underrated and people need to learn the art and science behind the violence that we all love but don't know why.

This series where you revisit fans' split opinions on a fight is as amazing as your post fight breakdowns. Art in the sea of online choices.

dattrax
Автор

Oh okay I see makes more sense as to Khamazt getting the W, nice to know you actually corrected that one strike at 6:00. Good reviews of these fights as always my man.

Aslan_Fulgore
Автор

Khamzat proved he is top 5 material. But burns also proved hes human.
I think he should be matched up with the winner of Belal and Luque instead of Colby, so he has a platform to show improvements. Going straight for Colby might be a big risk, although it would be a big sell.

joshuavanzuydam
Автор

Bro you’ve done it again! Phenomenal video man

ybmsimba
Автор

I just rewatched the fight, and I have to agree. If someone scored it for Gilbert, I wouldn't be mad. It was unbelievably close. But I think Khamzat won by a paper thin margin.

ekayn
Автор

Watching it live, I thought Khamzat edged out the round. This one could’ve gone either way and not have been a robbery.

jasont