filmov
tv
[B] THE Historical PROBLEMS with MECCA (at CCSJ)

Показать описание
Jay now moves from the sources to confront the historical problems with Mecca, the 2nd part of this talk which he did on August 4 at Calvary Chapel San Jose.
So, why is Mecca so important? Because it still exists, & thus can be researched.
What's more, we all know that Islam is dependent on 3 things, a Book called the Qur’an, a man known as Muhammad, and a Place called Mecca. When you begin to attack the Place (Mecca), the other two begin to wobble. But once you destroy the Place (Mecca), you destroy the other two as well. Thus, if we eradicate Mecca, then there is no Islamic Muhammad, nor an Islamic Qur’an, and down falls Islam.
So, let’s begin by looking at what Muslims claim for Mecca.
•Mecca is where Adam and Eve were thrown down to, from the Garden of Eden (Surah 7:24)
•Mecca is where Abraham lived when he destroyed the idols within the Ka’aba (Surah 21:51-71)
•Mecca is the center of trade North, South, East and West (Montgomery Watt’s ‘Trade Route Theory’)
So, it should be one of the best known and best documented places in history! Yet, there are enormous problems, including:
Conclusion #1: Mecca is important for Muslims because they believe that it is the earliest and most important city in the history of Mankind. Yet, references to Mecca in the Qur’an/Traditions don’t hold up historically (i.e. that it’s near Sodom and Gomorrah, or that Abraham, Ishmael and Hagar lived there).
Conclusion #2: The Vegetation & Peoples listed there are all 600 – 1,000 miles to the north. Other references suggest that Mecca is filled with lush fruit trees, grass, grains and streams, which make no sense as Mecca has always been in a desert with bad and depleted desert soil. What's more, geographically speaking, the Qur’an places almost all of its sixty-five referenced areas 600 – 1,000 miles further north of Mecca as well, suggesting that the authors of the Qur’an came from there.
Conclusion #3: The Qur’anic Arabic, as well as the supposed prophets are all situated to the north. Take a look at the Arabic word endings used in the Qur’an, such as the Aliph Maqsurah, or the Tarmabutah, or the definite article; none of them come from Mecca, but from Nabataean Aramaic, which is again situated 600 miles further north, while anyone writing in the Hijaz (Mecca) would have written in Sabaic Arabic, which is in the south (Yemen today).
Conclusion #4: No one has ever heard of it, due to where it sits, over 3,000 feet down off the trade route. When Dr Patricia Crone researched the surrounding civilizations to see if they had ever heard of the city of Mecca, not one knew of its existence, including those empires which were situated immediately close by. Yet, other much less significant towns close to Mecca (i.e. Ma’rib, Sana’a, Najran, Taif, Yathrib, Khaybar, Petra and Mamre) are all well-known and well documented; yet not one reference for Mecca. And the reason? When noting the trade route through these towns, we find that they are all located on the Western Plateau, while Mecca is over 3,000 feet down below it, proving it was not on any trade route.
Conclusion #5: Up to 741 AD, no historian, nor any geographer had ever referred to this city. When Ptolemy in the 2nd c. wrote his book on ‘Arabian Geography’, he never listed Mecca, so that none of the earliest 15th-16th c. European maps of Arabia have Mecca listed on them either. Neither the Land trade route (along the Arabian Western plateau), nor the Red Sea trade routes (along the East African coast) supports an early Mecca, proving that none of the trade went via Mecca at all, confronting the notion that it was the center of trade.
Conclusion #6: Here’s why no one heard of it…two words…”no water”. If you don't have water, you have no food; no food, no people; no people, no towns; no towns, now cities; no cities, no civilizations; no civilizations, no history! It's as simple as that. Despite Muslim’s claims for the ZamZam well (that Allah provides its “inexhaustible water” for over 1 billion believers), it gets all its water from desalinization plants built in the USA and Europe.
Conclusion #7: No mosque had a Qibla facing Mecca until 715 AD. Muslims have no idea why all of the earliest Qiblas were facing Petra (or Jerusalem) up to 706 AD, nor why none are facing Mecca until 715 AD. This suggests Mecca was chosen by the Abbasids in the 8th c. as their final sanctuary. The antecedents for the Meccan pilgrimage makes more sense with Jerusalem than they do with Petra, as they are not only earlier, but they use many of the same functions.
In Conclusion: Certainly, someone, somewhere, at some time should have known about this city; yet no-one, anywhere, nor at any time has, proving that it never existed at the time of Muhammad, nor during early Islam!
Note: if Mecca didn’t exist, then who is Muhammad and where did the Qur’an come from?
That’s next…
© Pfander Centre for Apologetics & Polemics - US, August 21, 2024
(109,170)
So, why is Mecca so important? Because it still exists, & thus can be researched.
What's more, we all know that Islam is dependent on 3 things, a Book called the Qur’an, a man known as Muhammad, and a Place called Mecca. When you begin to attack the Place (Mecca), the other two begin to wobble. But once you destroy the Place (Mecca), you destroy the other two as well. Thus, if we eradicate Mecca, then there is no Islamic Muhammad, nor an Islamic Qur’an, and down falls Islam.
So, let’s begin by looking at what Muslims claim for Mecca.
•Mecca is where Adam and Eve were thrown down to, from the Garden of Eden (Surah 7:24)
•Mecca is where Abraham lived when he destroyed the idols within the Ka’aba (Surah 21:51-71)
•Mecca is the center of trade North, South, East and West (Montgomery Watt’s ‘Trade Route Theory’)
So, it should be one of the best known and best documented places in history! Yet, there are enormous problems, including:
Conclusion #1: Mecca is important for Muslims because they believe that it is the earliest and most important city in the history of Mankind. Yet, references to Mecca in the Qur’an/Traditions don’t hold up historically (i.e. that it’s near Sodom and Gomorrah, or that Abraham, Ishmael and Hagar lived there).
Conclusion #2: The Vegetation & Peoples listed there are all 600 – 1,000 miles to the north. Other references suggest that Mecca is filled with lush fruit trees, grass, grains and streams, which make no sense as Mecca has always been in a desert with bad and depleted desert soil. What's more, geographically speaking, the Qur’an places almost all of its sixty-five referenced areas 600 – 1,000 miles further north of Mecca as well, suggesting that the authors of the Qur’an came from there.
Conclusion #3: The Qur’anic Arabic, as well as the supposed prophets are all situated to the north. Take a look at the Arabic word endings used in the Qur’an, such as the Aliph Maqsurah, or the Tarmabutah, or the definite article; none of them come from Mecca, but from Nabataean Aramaic, which is again situated 600 miles further north, while anyone writing in the Hijaz (Mecca) would have written in Sabaic Arabic, which is in the south (Yemen today).
Conclusion #4: No one has ever heard of it, due to where it sits, over 3,000 feet down off the trade route. When Dr Patricia Crone researched the surrounding civilizations to see if they had ever heard of the city of Mecca, not one knew of its existence, including those empires which were situated immediately close by. Yet, other much less significant towns close to Mecca (i.e. Ma’rib, Sana’a, Najran, Taif, Yathrib, Khaybar, Petra and Mamre) are all well-known and well documented; yet not one reference for Mecca. And the reason? When noting the trade route through these towns, we find that they are all located on the Western Plateau, while Mecca is over 3,000 feet down below it, proving it was not on any trade route.
Conclusion #5: Up to 741 AD, no historian, nor any geographer had ever referred to this city. When Ptolemy in the 2nd c. wrote his book on ‘Arabian Geography’, he never listed Mecca, so that none of the earliest 15th-16th c. European maps of Arabia have Mecca listed on them either. Neither the Land trade route (along the Arabian Western plateau), nor the Red Sea trade routes (along the East African coast) supports an early Mecca, proving that none of the trade went via Mecca at all, confronting the notion that it was the center of trade.
Conclusion #6: Here’s why no one heard of it…two words…”no water”. If you don't have water, you have no food; no food, no people; no people, no towns; no towns, now cities; no cities, no civilizations; no civilizations, no history! It's as simple as that. Despite Muslim’s claims for the ZamZam well (that Allah provides its “inexhaustible water” for over 1 billion believers), it gets all its water from desalinization plants built in the USA and Europe.
Conclusion #7: No mosque had a Qibla facing Mecca until 715 AD. Muslims have no idea why all of the earliest Qiblas were facing Petra (or Jerusalem) up to 706 AD, nor why none are facing Mecca until 715 AD. This suggests Mecca was chosen by the Abbasids in the 8th c. as their final sanctuary. The antecedents for the Meccan pilgrimage makes more sense with Jerusalem than they do with Petra, as they are not only earlier, but they use many of the same functions.
In Conclusion: Certainly, someone, somewhere, at some time should have known about this city; yet no-one, anywhere, nor at any time has, proving that it never existed at the time of Muhammad, nor during early Islam!
Note: if Mecca didn’t exist, then who is Muhammad and where did the Qur’an come from?
That’s next…
© Pfander Centre for Apologetics & Polemics - US, August 21, 2024
(109,170)
Комментарии