Camille Vasquez Catches Amber Heard Using Edited Photo -- A Lawyer Explains

BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay

All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.

[NocturnalSoundscapes]

I’m a graphic designer and I did the same test as you in Photoshop the day this happened. It’s pixel for pixel the same exact photo (after resizing the larger photo down a bit). I even went so far as to take the non-manipulated photo and adjusted the saturation (bump the reds, etc) and I was able to recreate nearly the same effect as she did.

[ACL]

The fact that Amber thinks we are all that stupid really speaks to her delusion and arrogance. Its obviously the same photo, and AH obviously needs serious psychological help.

[theonlyju]

"I've never edited a photograph." - that statement coming from any person with social media of any kind, not even counting the fact she's an actor, is so unbelievably stupid it kills her credibility yet again. Even worse than saying she wouldn't know how to send a video to someone.

[nicolaxoxo]

It makes me sick how she has gotten away with this. She flagrantly ignored the court’s order to turn over devices in a timely manner and where’s the metadata?

[matumbimonkey]

Amber is very good at using weesle words to gaslight people.
"I didnt punch you, I hit you, you're not hurt"
"I didnt edit the photo"
Pledge = donation

[lisahunkin]

I thought the fact she said “I’ve never edited a photo” was absolutely an absurd thing to ask us to believe. Who hasn’t edited a photo on their iPhone??! Not in a bad way, but we’ve all changed, cropped, brightened dim lighting etc. Thanks for all the analysis!

[AmandaPaige]

I love how Camille Vasquez has the incredible ability to show the evidence of truth without actually saying it out loud, letting us draw our own conclusions! She's fantastic imo.

[chungjj]

As a photographer, literally it’s the same
photo. No new shadows, no new highlights, it’s exactly the same image frame with increased saturation, or at least an overall color correction toward red/orange hues. It’s humanly impossible to take the same photo twice unless you’re a human tripod; which in this case, AH may possibly be just that, a tool.

[slash]

I'm a photographer. I immediately knew it was the same image when they appeared. The giveaway was the hair, lighting and shadow. The stands of hair sticking out never moved. The light source remained the same. You can see the hard light on her forehead and nose. The shadows in both photos indicate there is one light source coming from her above right. Turning on vanity lights would change the the position of the shadow. Light and shadows make or break photography. You need to know your light sources. It was a terrible lie.

[brentm]

I’m a professional photographer and I can tell you without any effort that they are two edits of the same photo. Fly-away Hair strands are in identical positions which is impossible to achieve in photos even a few seconds apart.

Ps - I posted this in the first minute of the video, as I’ve been saying this since the day in the trial they were first shown

[IzzyMariel]

The most egregious photo manipulations are those that were supposedly taken the evening of the May 21 with different hairstyles and different jewelry. It would mean she curled her hair and changed her jewelry after the police left that evening.🙄

[krimsonkodiak]

You're 100% right Ian. I'm a photographer and I've taken thousands of portrait shots of people. Even if the subject stays as still as possible, if I move the camera even the tiniest amount the resulting photo will be different, and absolutely will not line up exactly when compared semi-transparent like you have. Literally the only way for this to be possible would be for her to have had the camera/phone on a tripod or solid mount of some kind, stayed as still as possible, used a high-speed burst mode (at least 10 frames per second), while the light was changed/turned on remotely or by someone else. I find the likelihood of that to be very, very low.

It is an edited photo.

[kinesis]

I've been taking portraits for the last 3 years, and achieving 2 pictures that are exactly the same is a physical impossibility. Even with a tripod, camera on burst shot, and someone else turning a light on between burst shots. If you're on your own, using a phone, then it'll never happen. It absolutely busted my head when I watched this live. It's the clearest case of manipulation I've seen with a photo and was very frustrated that more wasn't made of this.

[Durkur_Owl]

1 million dollar question: can team JD call a digital photo expert witness to expose this lie explicitly? It would show perjury 100%

[Aerie]

That photo was the same photo, but different filters. It was the exact same photo. You can tell just by looking at it that those two photos are the exact same.

[waynehumphries]

There’s no way the photo was taken later, every strand of hair is in the same place. She must be insane to think she can lie to the world and have everyone believe it 💩

[natashaboerner]

Being someone who does digital image manipulation... the chances of her having EVERYTHING identical, her hair, her eyes, everything, after moving to turn on the light it's impossible to get an identical image after moving. Her eyelids are in the exact same position. And the shadows haven't changed. Which would change from an overhead light to a light coming from infront of her.

[mooseoxtank]

Amber is so crazy it almost makes her act like a toddler denying he ate the cake with frosting all over his face. Very bad acting, very bad lying. The knife, the pocket knife, the lies just pile up and frankly it is just freaking sad.

[kingginger]

When you're taking a picture of yourself, it's literally impossible to the exact same picture 2 times in a row. If she took the first picture, and then moved in any way to turn the light on, then she could not achieve the exact same image moments later. If you look at the background, there is no difference between the green and white areas of the wall behind her. Not only did she get the exact background correctly, she got the same exact angle and not one piece of her hair is out of place. There's no way in million years, that she or someone else could take the exact same picture, even moments apart from eachother

[Chuloon]

I am a photo editor & cannot believe she tried to say these are different 😳 she really believes we are all idiots