Eugene Bagashov: Where Did Asteroids Come From? | Space News

For many decades, in the standard story of our solar system, we have been told that asteroids, as well as comets and meteoroids are the so-called left-overs of the early solar system. In this view, comets and asteroids have been proposed as the possible source of our planet’s oceans. Of course, when spacecraft have visited comets they’ve not found anything like the dirty snowballs of conventional theory. In this conclusion to his three-part presentation, physicist Eugene Bagashov explores the latest scientific papers into the evidence for the water of the asteroids Bennu and Ryugu, respectively, and what it means for our understanding of the solar system’s history and origins.

If you see a CC with this video, it means that subtitles are available. To find out which ones, click on the Gear Icon in the lower right area of the video box and click on “subtitles” in the drop-down box. Then click on the subtitle that you would like.

Twitter: @tboltsproject

[davidjinks]

The more of these videos I watch, the more amazed I am at the brilliance and foresight of the late Tom Van Flandern, the former director of the USNO. All EU proponents *must* read TVF's seminal work "Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets" to fully appreciate the importance of the EU's work. While the mainstream models are constantly being falsified by new observations, TVF's Meta Model and EU predictions are repeatedly being confirmed. Thanks for pressing forward, guys, and please throw a bone to Van Flandern when you can.

[desertlobster]

The man is a genius. Thx for your innovative work.

[MrBrelindm]

I like the questions Eugene asks. There's a lot to ponder on there!

[robertquick]

Nothin' like Eugene w/ my mornin' coffee... Yes, electrochemistry, OH, not H2O.

[numbersix]

I am wondering if the data from the Magnetometer shows "unexpected" data and the Mainline Physicist have no idea of what to do with it.

[velikovskysghost]

Eugene Bagashov does it again with another well put together space news podcast. I just wonder how long mainstream science can hold on to the antiquated Victorian vintage theories ideas and concepts? Thanks again Eugene and thunderbolts.

[DeathValleyDazed]

I love listening to this clear thinking scientist. Thanks for including him with the Thunderbolts!

[scottadams]

Wonderful videos with these 3 videos by Eugene Bagashov, thank you for sharing with us

[razoruk]

Thank you EU/TP & Mr. Bagashov. You espouse the truer, real scientific method, and admit that you are/have insightful opinions of hypothesis, not 'factual' theories of only illogical opinion.

[mcaballeropose]

Great work Eugene. Thank you very much.

[ObsidianRadio]

From my laymens standpoint it looks like to me that many of our Asteroids in the asteroid belt came from two sources. One is the ejecta from massive super volcanoes. The other is the remains of a planets surface that got blasted into space during the electro formation of mountains, valleys, canyons and craters.


Imagine a giant volcano on Earth, Mars and Jupiter blasting their material with so much force. The matter goes up into space, quickly cools down and becomes the modern asteroid. Where as with the cratering. Ask yourself this question. With all these massive chunks of a planets surface missing(Valles Marineris) Where did all the material go?

[riffhurricane]

Always interested to hear what Eugene has to say, thank you for putting this out. Also (& apologies) 1st post yeaaah! :)

[holon]

Eugene Bagashov is my new favourite commentator on this channel along with Donald Scott. Both stick to matter-of-fact statements and they know that their words are not the ultimate truth. I also like Wal Thornhil alot, but he tends to communicate new ideas as if they were proven facts already. When the EU community want's to find more scientists that look at their work and check their ideas seriously, the EU members should really stick to the matter-of-fact style presentation. Eugene Bagashov is a perfect example of how to do that.

[Dre_Key]

What's really cool is how Eugene sometimes responds to comments in his videos here.

Why are impacts the only explanation given even with this mound of data available?

[mikeharrington]

More questions than answers in the thirst for more knowledge & understanding of the universe.

[repsychled]

I would like to nominate Mars, as a main donor to the asteroid count, and Venus also, Earthy on a much smaller scale. Which would explain where the hell millions of cubic km of Mars' crust went. Consider: if discharge between planets is the way they equalize charge, then in the polar config, when Mars gained its oscillation between Venus and Earth, Venus was quite involved in a massive plasma intimacy with Saturn. Trying to match charges, Mars becomes attracted, and when close enough, discharges to Venus, which in turn is charged backed by Saturn. Must've been Epic. ( or should I saw Legendary) When equalized, they repel, and it's Earths turn. Discharge, repel, back to venus...It MUST have been extremely violent for Venus as well, it having an unusually powerful charge supplied by Saturn. Where did they come from? They were blasted from the crust of Mars, Venus, and Earth. I would also predict that the "meteor showers" are direct evidence (and the result) of Arc machining from the planets, akin to a scab, or scar...or blood trail. Even further I would predict that the different showers would be separated into 2 main types, 1-being a mixtures of Mars/Earth ejecta, and 2- being a mixture of mars Venus ejecta. The larger of the 2 swarms I would think to be from Mars/Venus. Simply looking at the " Alien sky " Images I can only imagine the Awesome display it must've been, in silence, no doubt the birth of Legends. On our side ....true terror, the wrath of gods. The timescale so vast to seem as forever. Thank You guys, for giving me a chance to glimpse our truly wondrous past. THE THIRD STORY.
\

[kristimcgowandarkoscellard]

I have a question that may sound silly but I really don’t understand it. In the close up image of the asteroid it showed loose small stones and pebbles on it’s surface, if the asteroid is tumbling through the vacuum of outer space how are these loose stones remaining stuck to the asteroid?? Shouldn’t they be floating away in the weightless environment of space? I don’t believe this asteroid is big enough to generate it’s own gravity?? Is it? And if it is then my next question is how big does an object need to be before it generates it’s own gravity?? This was a fascinating video!
Cheers

[dafttool]

The Asteroid Belt is from the destruction of Tiamat, so a great many asteroids are just those rocks still orbiting about the Sun

[carlosantuckwell]

2:45 in -- Yes, I remember reading that years before: "There is at least as much water in our mantle as on the surface of our planet." I read that 80% of most magma / lava is water (bound up with the molten rock. I can't remember how much water (percentage-wise) is released in evaporation during eruptions.

[tharealBDOGG]

Iv recently been looking at the Kuiper belt objects and i have to say they look more like tektites and larger versions of mirco spherules which iv read are created by molten material cooling after an impact, volcanic event or solar event... could you comment on this.