Resolving the UUID[] Saving Issue in Vapor/Fluent: A Guide for Developers

Discover how to fix the `UUID[]` saving problem in your Vapor/Fluent Coin model, plus tips on managing complex relationships.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Vapor/Fluent: Child object not saving when array of uuids in schema

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the UUID[] Saving Issue in Vapor/Fluent: A Guide for Developers

When developing applications using Vapor and Fluent, developers may encounter various challenges, particularly when it comes to saving complex data structures. One such common problem arises when attempting to save an array of UUIDs in your model. In this post, we will dive into a specific case involving a Coin entity where defining an array of UUIDs led to an error during the save operation. Let’s explore the issue more closely and provide a clear solution.

The Problem: Error Saving UUID Array

The scenario revolves around a Coin entity that needs to maintain a reference to other Coin entities through an attribute called sources. This attribute was intended to be an array of UUIDs that help track back the origin of any coin. However, when attempting to save coins with this relationship, an error occurred:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error indicates that there was a mismatch between the expected data type in the database (uuid[]) and what was being provided (jsonb[]). Understanding this problem is crucial for resolving it effectively.

Understanding the Error

The root cause of the error lies in how the sources property was defined in the Coin model. Originally, it was declared as:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By attempting to save an array of Coin objects, Fluent was serializing them into JSON format instead of correctly fitting them into a UUID array. Consequently, when the application tried to save the data, PostgreSQL rejected the operation because it couldn’t process a JSON array in the context it was meant to handle UUIDs.

The Solution: Redefining the Sources Property

To fix this issue, the sources property needs to be properly defined as an array of UUIDs instead of an array of Coin objects. This change ensures that we declare the reference types correctly as UUIDs, aligning with your database schema.

Updated Model Definition

Here’s how to redefine the sources attribute in your model:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation

Type Change: By changing the type from [Coin] to [UUID], you ensure that the data being saved matches the expected format in the database.

Data Integrity: Using UUIDs retains the necessary back-referencing functionality without complicating the database transactions.

Alternative Relationships

If your logic involves tracking objects more directly, consider employing a relationship structure such as one-to-many or many-to-many, depending upon how you manage the coins. This approach enables more flexibility in operations and the ability to maintain data integrity while scaling up the data structure.

Conclusion

The issue with saving an array of UUIDs in your Vapor/Fluent application is both common and easily resolvable. By changing your array type from [Coin] to [UUID], you rectify the database mismatch and enhance your entity's functionality. Keep in mind that defining relationships correctly not only resolves errors but can also lead to better architecture for your applications.

If you encounter similar issues in your development journey, don't hesitate to refer back to this guide, or explore Fluent's documentation for more in-depth information about relationships and data handling.