Facing Wildfire Risk, Homeowners Turn to New Innovations to Protect Their Homes

preview_player
Показать описание
Some Bay Area homeowners and homebuilders are taking action to reduce their wildfire risk with new innovations. Consumer Investigative Reporter Chris Chmura reports.

Stay connected:

Catch up on all the day's news:

Download our mobile app:

Watch us on OTT:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Why do you always pick the most expensive way to fireproof your house?
Here is my fire prevention strategy. I covered the entire exterior of my 1000 sq. ft. house with 1/2" sheetrock, then house wrap, then 1/4" cement board, then 1\2" cement board from ground level to three feet up. All exterior wood trim is covered with galvanized metal and the windows are plugged with removable 1/2" sheetrock. There is absolutely no combustible material on the exterior of the house including the roof. As an extra measure during fire season, I lean two foot tall 1/2" thick panels of sheetrock against base of the house to create a fire-resistant berm which keeps fire two feet away from the walls. Even if the sheetrock deteriorates and crumbles after several hours of intense heat the fire still has to burn through 1 1/4" of noncombustible cement board and sheetrock, which will not happen! The ground around the house has been cleared of any combustible material to a distance of at least six feet all around the house and any vegetation within sixty feet of the house is kept to a height of no more than four inches. Trees are kept far enough away so should any tree catch fire the flames will stay at least ten feet away from the house. To test my modifications, I built a four foot by eight foot test wall which replicates the house wall construction and two three foot by eight foot wing walls on each side of the wall, in order to contain the heat of the fire that I built at the base of the wall. I fanned the fire to simulate a twenty mile per hour wind which brought the fire up to around 1000 degrees. I kept stoking the fire for five hours. (I did the test without using the two foot tall 1/2" thick panels of sheetrock leaning against the house.) The end result was the that the first 12" of the exterior 1/2" cement board crazed, cracked and crumbled, however the next layer behind the 1/2" cement board which was 1/4" cement board became slightly brittle but did not crumble and the next layer behind that was 1/2" sheetrock which was unscathed. I also did a heat test on the entire wall while the fire was burning with the following results. The temperature within the first 12" was approximately 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, at 20" up the temperature dropped to approximately 600 degrees, at 40" up the temperature was approximately 350 degrees, at 60" up the temperature was 200 degrees, at 80" up the temperature was 125 degrees and at 96" up the temperature was basically ambient temperature. I found that the first 20" from the ground level are by far the most vulnerable.

cranesouder
Автор

most homes lost in wildfires catch fire from embers that kindle light fuels close to the house. The first five feet is some of the easies and most important area to saving a home from a wildfire. There is never 100 % grantee your home will survive but odds can be increased.

SkylinersYeti
Автор

I hope these companies and similar are looking north to places like Kelowna in British Columbia. We need to use strategies to prevent/minimize future fire damage.

Sharon-bose
Автор

The fire officials I've talked to in San Mateo County have said a house wildfire sprinkler system could cause the water pressure to be lower for them making it more difficult to fight fires in the neighborhood.

patcuvie
Автор

My house was made by fire. Brick, concrete, steel.

bobfuhr
Автор

Insurance companies don't want solutions for California they just want out of California.

jayteesevenseven
Автор

New innovations?

It’s a sprinkler with an App For 20k

Not really confidence inspiring.

geistacwm
Автор

Or you just build your house out of fireproof materials. Easier

ocmetals
Автор

that 1st house with the sprinklers- yeah its got a little resistance to a ground fire but if the fire is crowning- no matter how much water is being sprayed around, it will flash to steam and the house will catch fire anyway. need to have a defensible space around the home- nothing combustable within 50ft radius and in the next 100ft radius everything needs 10ft spacing. thats why he cant get insured, he hasnt done enough to help fireproof his home. + sprinklers on homes isnt the new innovation- that idea has been around for decades. its just the technology to start and run it is the innovation.

stinkfinger
Автор

For starters stop building your houses out of (fire)wood

markusr
Автор

I just forwarded this to all of my family members

roberthenderson
Автор

I really think my city should place some sort of defensive system in all of their newer residential buildings. It’s the city of Morgan Hill California

roberthenderson
Автор

Anything to fight /prevent fire is worth doing he says . but apparently cutting down trees 30 metres away from the house is not worth it.

beingsneaky
Автор

excellent for fire. divine during heatwave...

abcxyz-ec
Автор

Yeah he had trees right next to the house. And it seemed like some sprinklers under the roof. You need them up on the roof.

beingsneaky