The Science of Nuclear Physics, Stars, and the Early Universe

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Meanwhile Neil Degrass Tyson: This is the way that it is!

stagger
Автор

"All is as it was before. Many such journeys are possible. Let me be your guide"

georgegbalzano
Автор

So imperfect from old civilization they were doom and now we have a second chance to be human an people

juanpena
Автор

What happens when you look the other way

larrykoon
Автор

We see it here and not there. It has to have been this way.

Kalryuabides
Автор

Truly, I am a fan, of physics and of Brian. But, I have some doubts regarding these statements. Yes, we so see what was when looking at distant things. But, so we see it exactly as it was. Was it changed in some way in which we dont know. Then, what is the reference and how was that data obtained. Lastly, for this, what is your sample size. Regardless of my doubts, I still find this subject fascinating!

robert-zjef
Автор

It's an assumption that there was less.

martinploughboy
Автор

Be humble? So maybe saying things like "respect the science" isn't productive to science?

plumlogan
Автор

"We understand" Yeah we have been saying that for thousands of years and we were wrong for most of it. But we are absolutely right now :-)

Phillold
Автор

You mean like, NOTHING EXPLODED and the result is all the Universe...???

maddashgraphics
Автор

Wrong! It's Not Made! is it not Matter can not be created or destroyed only changed

MarkDSmith-trcp
join shbcf.ru