Why have physicists misunderstood the Bohmian quantum potential? Noncommutative nonlocal nondualism

contact with the discussion on the thermodynamic origin of time....Yet
curiously the instant is a set of measure zero sandwiched between the
infinity of that which has passed and the infinity of that which is not yet.
This is fine for evolution of point-like entities but not for the evolution of
structures."
"Recall Heisenberg's (1925) original suggestion that x(t), the position of the electron in the atom, must be replaced by
Xq (t) = R n,n − a( )
a
∑ exp[i n,n − a( )t]
The exponent ensures that the Ritz combination rule of atomic spectra can
be satisfied, namely
(n,n − a) + (n − a,n − a − b) = (n,n − a − b).
This result in needed when we form variables like Xq(t)2 which appear in the
discussion of a quantum oscillator. Heisenberg then proposed that the
amplitudes combine as
R(n,n − b) = R(n,n − a)R(n − a,n − b)
a
∑
14
This is immediately recognised as the rule for matrix multiplication. It is
when this matrix idea is extended to momentum we find the need for the
Heisenberg commutation relations. Notice here we are talking about
transitions between stationary states, one being characterised by quantum
number n and the other characterised by (n− a). Thus we are talking about
transitions between one state and another, that is between structures defining
what has been to what will be."....
"it is also 'non-local' in
time. I see this as an a-local concept, which has extension in time. It is a
kind of 'extenson' or 'duron'. We can think of this as a necessary
consequence of the energy-time uncertainty principle. "....
"So the 'environment sink' appears to be acting as if it were 'anticipating the future'."

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

People barely vote in the U.S. since it's too hard to get time off work, etc. or all the racist suppression tactics. Being political is often just trying to survive for most people - and if it comes to having "views" yes these reflect the corporate-state indoctrination - basically what is on television or algorithms. hmmm - like the Bare-footed peasant in Venezeula who told me they were going to vote for the first time in their life since Chavez was running for president in 1998. Well the "policy" focus on abrupt global warming needs to take the science more seriously. It seems to be the Aerosol Masking Effect and the methane eruption out of the arctic ocean has locked us into a biological annihilation scenario. We are told to mitigate damage by "deindustrialization" or whatever the Green Rage people preach but they continue to ignore the Aerosol Masking Effect. That fact is that even in the abrupt global warming "activist' scene there is denial about the truth of "policy" focus. Trying to ignore the science so people can fixate on "action" is just a typical modern tactic of indoctrination.