Traditional Machining of a Pocket Vs. iMachining of a Pocket

This video compares the milling of a pocket with a traditional 2.5D tool path vs. an iMachining tool path. The traditional pocketing is shown on the left with simulation up top and live cutting on the bottom. This traditional tool path has a "Racetrack" pattern, resulting in sharp corner change of direction points throughout the operation. iMachining, shown on the right, uses a dramatically different pattern for tool path, resulting in no sharp corners anywhere in an operation. iMachining is revolutionary, taking only 2 minutes and 51 seconds to machine this pocket; whereas, the traditional machining of the same pocket took 11 minutes and 16 seconds. Take note of the time stamps comparing the elapsed times.

[dejanmavija]

koga vi jebete? :D levo slika je ubrzana!!!