Training the Blackmar Diemer Gambit

I play a 5-minute blitz game, leading into the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit, and then show you my current method for using Lichess studies to solidify my opening repertoire.

[SvilenKlasanov]

4:12 you had Qg5 going after the pawn in front of the King also crushing ... also in the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit taking in the first few moves with the Q is called Halosar trap :) check it it's very very crazy

[hankhill]

6:19 I think it would've been interesting to go Re5 Ne6+. Pretty much no matter what happens you're gonna be up at least a pawn, and there's not much counterplay. If he goes Qa5 after Re5 forking your Queen and Rook, you check him with tempo and then capture his queen with your queen, which at that point you can just gobble his c pawn.
Pretty much only commenting this so I can talk out the line to myself, so not really a critique of how you played. I mean, I'm rated 300, so I'm really in no position to criticize lol

[TheMichiganFishHunter]

Good game. Some interesting tactics. Well done my good man.

[moseskamau]

I like your after game analysis.
You'd make a very good coach and chess study partner.
Quite insightful!

[mikehresko]

I also use both websites and really enjoyed your process. Ive never used some the functions you highlighted like marking blunders and being best...As a study builder <Building Habits Unofficial>.. I've got some work to do. Subbed and Thanks.

[RaptureReady]

5:03… black bishop takes white bishop and black is better

[petermorcos]

Really interesting game and video. Am I going crazy, or were there some really interesting potential tactics if instead of going ng5, you had taken nxd5? The calculation seems tricky, but intuitively it feels like there's a lot there. Was there nothing there on review? Edit: I meant nxd5 instead of bxg7, and I think they're probably about the same, but nxd5 feels like it probably makes everything horrendously complicated!