Gravity 'Debunked'? Uh... No

preview_player
Показать описание

My Twitter: @MartymerM81
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Never forget Isaac newton, Hero of 1950s, Married to marilyn monroe

TheReaper
Автор

Desertphile deserves an award for his long standing contribution to Youtube science education.

TheStoneSpiral
Автор

The secret to flying is jumping and then missing the ground.

FonVegen
Автор

Did.. Did he just confuse table salt and hydrochloric acid?

MicroBlogganism
Автор

To be fair 1950 is much closer to Newton than 6000 is to the real age of the Earth.

Hedning
Автор

To be fair, I can see why he'd distrust Newton... the man is publishing 200 years after his death. That's pretty suspect, eh?

Calvin_OBlenis
Автор

ERRATA:
1) The distance between the bodies in the diagram should of course be _r, _ not _r^2._
2) This guy thinks table salt is chemically identical to hydrochloric acid. I kept thinking sodium, but he actually said and showed hydrogen. Of course, HCl is also polar, so his point still stands (well... as far as he's concerned). I do wish I had caught this one, though.

Martymer
Автор

Come on Martymer, gravity repels gravity. That's why everything floats. Drop a ball and what happens? It shoots straight up into the air. And do asteroids hit planets? Not even close, they bounce off planets gravities. Otherwise you'd have loads of craters on the moon and it's perfectly smooth!

nicosmind
Автор

It's so ridiculously simple. 1) No *Gravity* = Absence of center-seeking centripetal *Acceleration.* 2) Absence of center-seeking centripetal *Acceleration* = Erasure of the secondary contingent force of *Weight.* 3) Erasure of the secondary contingent force of *Weight* = Lack of *Pressure Gradients* throughout the surrounding medium. 4) Lack of *Pressure Gradients* throughout the surrounding medium = Subsequent omitting of the *Buoyant force* (which is entirely dependent on weight to grant it's properties) by simulating the zero pressure of a vacuum i.e. earth's external environment. 5) Subsequent omitting of the *Buoyant force* by simulating the zero pressure of a vacuum = Renders all meaning of the piss poor *"Density" ad hoc conjecture both arbitrary & asinine.* It all ties back to gravity in the form of mass/ matter. Oceans on a flat earth in absence of gravity would naturally coalesce into *giant, free-floating and weightless orbs of water, * and absolutely nothing (regardless of it's density) would rise "up" or sink "down" through this medium whatsoever... Period! This is precisely why water, flames and all manner of mediums (including solid mass) will agglomerate into GLOBES under their own *radial epicenter of centripetal convergence.*

In sum: Gravity is the independent, non-contingent and immutable *principle* or *prima causa.* Density, buoyancy, pressure and weight are not autonomous. Unlike gravity which cannot be erased, all these subsequent effects result or arise from the dynamic interplay of gravity acting on and between both objects and mediums; all 4 are all nothing more than epiphenomenal *posterior attributes* in the purest Platonic denotation. _Because they are certainly not _*_autonomous principles_*_ in the universe they do not work or act on- let alone govern- anything at all. Not without their initial CAUSE._

thephaneron
Автор

If Desertphile gets paid for every time someone uses his gravity clip then he must be a billionaire.

martinferguson
Автор

"I don't understand it, therefore it is wrong!": The kook's mantra.

inglepropnoosegarm
Автор

"...which Newton conceived in the early 1950's"

This gon be good

randys
Автор

I don't think he quite understands the gravity of the situation.

victorselve
Автор

First to Thank MArtymer81 for not dissapearing into a Youtube Blackhole.

robertw
Автор

holy crap, when you get to why satellites don't crash... even comedians know this:

"The art of learning to fly lies in learning to throw yourself at the ground... and miss."

-- Douglas Adams, "So Long And Thanks For All The Fish"

Fraterchaoraterchaos
Автор

"Gravity is repulsive force according to Newton"
I lost it there.

jorandax
Автор

It's been too long since we last had a good old Martymer ranting video, welcome back

JennFaeAge
Автор

“This guy is a flat earther”

Of Course!

GamingProspector
Автор

It always kills me how quickly flerfers dismiss astronomers... I worked at a planetarium in high school and college and one of the other staffers spent *_every_* clear night on the roof in our observatory (with our _massive_ telescope) collecting data for his doctorate (he had been spending the nights there for a very long time). According to the flerfers, after he finally got his degree, written his thesis, received his doctorate and finally landed his dream job at the *JPL, * they told him _”The Truth”_ that the globe model was a lie and that all they did was create CGI videos and other _”false”_ proof of a globe earth for *_”them”_* for *_reasons._* Apparently he and everyone else who worked there was ok with this and no one ever involved has come forward to expose this *_lie._* Yeah.... that makes loads of sense... smh.

grendelum
Автор

I just discovered your channel from my recommendations and boy I'm loving every minute! I'm looking forward to binging. I can't get enough of people fighting the good fight against people who know nothing about what their so passionately failing to debunk. Thanks again!!

Thornspyre