RETHINK EQ - It'll Change How You Mix Music

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Love how you just SPIT out the info, thats how videos like this should be made... no filler.

dpfxz
Автор

Epiphany time. I struggled to get my head around the idea of EQ for years. The concept that it's just extra faders for frequencies instantly resonated. I enjoy your videos immensely but this one just whacked me upside the head. Thanks soooo much.

dougpopejoy
Автор

These are fantastic edits Sage. It's been 7 years of learning, and I have never seen information and animation presented so seamlessly of a very nuanced concept.

tasenova
Автор

When you boost 100hz I perceive the pitch to be higher

Great channel!

alessandrociapica
Автор

Also worth looking into is the phase/time shifts near EQ curves (if minimal phase eq), or pre-ringing (if linear phase eq).

toxictower
Автор

Dang. I really need to get a linear phase eq. Pro Q too much $$$ at the moment
Thank you for the detailed video as usual!

inwex
Автор

7:18 static EQ does not introduce harmonic distortion. What you see is floating-point error (noise).

zsliu
Автор

Keep making such tutorials sir…so helpful for us ❤

eternal_music_ways
Автор

I recently noticed that sometimes you don’t specifically want what the fundamental offers in a sound but rather the overtones

SeFu
Автор

Great content as usual. Each video is so informative and deep 👏

hydratek_sounds
Автор

Is this why EQs that offer auto-gain may be of benefit? @6:00

Reggi_Sample
Автор

Phenomenal discussion, thank you for bringing attention to this.

TRXST.ISSUES
Автор

Always a pleasure to learn from you 🙏🏽❤️

Astro-xcc
Автор

Hello,
Cutting frequencies in the high range are not changing de maximum peak level of your signal as long as there is an other peak, I don't understand your example about the bass line at 6:40 ?

offoff
Автор

I record a solo piano player and I struggle to preserve or even increase the dynamic range of the piano and, get it to a more acceptable loudness so that it won't be bastardized by say, a Spotify normalization algorithm. I am beginning to think it's more difficult to mix for a solo instrument than for a whole band. Some would say "don't worry about your loudness level". But how can I not worry about that when the various streaming outlets will normalize to their own standards and possibly bastardize the mix? Sometimes I'll try EQing the 3.5kh area to increase the loudness a little but that almost always makes the piano sound a bit harsh or brittle.
Another thing I am noticing is that most sampled pianos will record a piano with a single mic but, what should be a mono signal is produced as a stereo signal which causes phase between the left and right channels of the track. I can "mostly" get the L and R aligned but still notice some affected attacks in the notes. Add another mic and the phase between the two mics makes things even worse. Of course, I can adjust for phase in that situation as well but ultimately, the attacks of certain notes still get a bit blunted. Because it's a solo piano, I have to take a lot more care to get it right as nuances are more noticeable. Help... Lost and lonely in Virginia.

newguy
Автор

Talking about the bass, you mean the lowest note's fundamental right? A bass line has not just "a fundamental" having multiple notes.

mttlsa
Автор

indeed there is almost half a tone difference on the 30 db boost ... But then, it's only my ear that is biased and it doesn't really exist on a "physical" level?. So if a sound is mixed too loudly in the middle of other sounds ... it could seem like it's out of tune with the others? How weird is this concept Sometimes I feel drowned in an ocean of unbridgeable gaps.

jacquesancillon
join shbcf.ru