Revolutionary Discovery! Webb Telescope Discovers 1st Ever 'Einstein Zig-Zag' Phenomenon

The James Webb Space Telescope has made a groundbreaking discovery—the first-ever 'Einstein Zig-Zag.' This rare gravitational lensing phenomenon reveals six images of a distant quasar created by two perfectly aligned galaxies. This cosmic breakthrough offers insights into dark energy, the Hubble constant, and the mysteries of the universe’s expansion. Dive into the science behind this remarkable find and its potential to reshape our understanding of cosmology. Don't miss this exciting journey through space and time!

Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:46 Discovery of the Einstein Zig-Zag
04:04 Implications for Cosmological Parameters
06:44 Broader Implications and Future Applications
09:02 Outro
09:18 Enjoy

MUSIC TITLE : Starlight Harmonies

Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:

Follow us

Join this channel to get access to these perks:

#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#BreakthroughDiscovery #JamesWebbSpaceTelescope #EinsteinZigZag #GravitationalLensing #AstronomyNews #CosmicBreakthrough #SpaceExploration #HubbleConstant #DarkEnergy #WebbTelescope #Cosmology #Galaxies #Quasar #Astrophysics #ScientificDiscovery #RarePhenomenon #EinsteinRelativity #JWSTFindings #SpaceScience #NASA #StarFormation #GalaxyEvolution #BlackHoles #UniverseExpansion #CosmicWonders #HubbleTension #SpacePhenomena #AstrophysicsExplained #LightBending #CosmicJourney #SpaceBreakthrough

[isatousarr]

Einstein's equations allow for spacetime to curve in response to mass and energy. This 'zig-zagging' could symbolize the chaotic and nonlinear paths of particles or light as they interact with warped spacetime near massive bodies like black holes or neutron stars. For instance, gravitational lensing where light bends around massive objects creates a literal zig-zag in our perception of distant galaxies. On a cosmic scale, phenomena like these highlight the elegant complexity of the universe, where straight lines often don't exist in the geometry of spacetime.

[beecnulr]

If the light we are seeing bends, then how can one determine where the source truly is?

[Zbezt]

Welldone~ excellent i expected nothing less

[moiraatkinson]

I’m getting to like these bite sized additions to my knowledge of space.

[dialectic-scietist]

Can you give us a scientific explanation how the bending of space and time fabric can create 6 obvious, virtual images of this quasar? And probably one of these images has to be the real, isn't so?

[OldMan]

Hopefully someone can/will answer this using layman speak.

How do you tell the difference between a lensed single object and multiple objects?

Considering the untold numbers of like or similar objects out there it has always baffled me. Without the possibility of viewing the area of concern from a significant different angle, I’m talking light years away from earth here, I’m not sure how astronomers can be so confident that it a lensed object. Maybe I will never know because the math required is greater than I can ever attain.

[goldwingerppg]

I find it fascinating what scientists are able to discover and learn, but I wish they would dumb it down a little for me. I’m guessing the zig zag of light bending around two galaxies are not sharp abrupt turns, but more like a wave expanding and contracting light waves. I thought maybe I didn’t understand the definition of zig zag, but now I think I’m missing something or maybe overthinking it.

[misskitty]

Look how insignificant the bending of space is in this example, it’s being magnified by a huge telescope and still barely visible, if space is warped then it’s very very insignificant

[jennawalsh]

Interesting that zigzag pattern looks like boomerangs too. Maybe this was figured out in past by ancient cultures

[robertstephens]

The Quesar demonstrates the possibility of 6 or more Earths

[roeva]

Hakuna matata -- it means "no worries!"

[joelwinberry]

Huh. So this doesn’t just reveal things we heard of but it also shows that not only do stars align but the same can happen for galaxies. Why not call it a galaxy alignment.

[johnvenier]

Why don’t you zoom out so we can see the whole zig zag at once?

[jonnyueland]

Its not gravity bending the light, its electromagnetics. Ref. findings with the JWST.

[csm]

The galactic disks ate not obstructing the light?

[hermesalmeida]

As Minhocas são bastante interessantes e sabem que caminho seguir. 😮😅😂

[NinaAriani-nm]

Assalamualaikum yaa robb mudahkanlah urusanku menuju ridhomu yaa Rokhman yaa rokhiim

[roberteakin]

Answer to the last question: None of the images are the actual quasar. Light bends in response of gravity. The images are
bent light that, if you were to draw a straight to any of the 6 images you would miss the quasar by lightyears. The bending of light by gravity was a pretty simple ad easy to demonstrate phenomena. The "Warping of Spacetime" was a weird misnomer that really amounts toothing. Einstein adopted this phrase in 1908 and it made no sense before that. I don't know why he would adopt such a confusing concept and run with it. Space is a mental concept assigned to measuring things. Take 8 points, such as a cube, and you get a "Space" Your mind doesn't change because things in this space bend around. Einstein, like all before his, relied on earlier shoulders to stand on. For Albert it was Maxwell primarily according to him. Others were Newton and Galileo. All made erroneous conclusions as did Einstein.
I don't understand why so many try to use Einstein's work, now demonstrated as flawed, except for to validate their own presentations by dropping his name. 115 years after Einstein's observations and theories there has been a mass of correction to his theories, much like what happened with Newton and others. That's how it works. Please stop dropping his name to validate your videos. Light speed isn't a constant as what thought way back then and has been known for decades. Don't be glib.

[emrek]

Your AI speech needs work. Kwazers? No, kwazArs.

[ronaldkemp]

I bet what they find will only confuse them more. The expansion rate they measure will not match any of the other measurements for the Hubble constant. There's no such thing as a Hubble constant. It's more like an average. The expansion of space is not the same anywhere in the universe. There's a big difference between a constant expansion of space and an average expansion of space.