Legal Expert Explains Why Baby Reindeer’s Alleged Stalker Doesn’t Have a Case

preview_player
Показать описание
Featuring Neama Rahmani of @westcoasttriallawyers

Lawyer Talks Diddy Arrest Chances & Rose Hanbury Slamming Stephen Colbert W/ Legal Notice

Check out More Legally Us:



Blac Chyna Reveals Which Kardashian Kid is Dream's Favorite Cousin:
Jill and Derick Dillard Talk Leaving Reality TV, Going to Therapy and New YouTube Channel
Sister Wives' Christine Brown on Marriage to Kody, Jealous and More
Chase Chrisley Says He Will 'Definitely' Marry Girlfriend Emmy Medders

#BabyReindeer #LegallyUs #usweekly
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

He's really wrong actually lol. She absolutely has a case.

RobinJusticeWoods
Автор

This legal analysis is completely wrong. The fact she wasn’t identified by name does not mean she wasn’t identifiable. Also, “if you don’t want attention, don’t give interviews”?? What kind of comment is that? She ABSOLUTELY has all the right in the world to defend herself when she’s receiving death threats as a result of the show. Who is the lawyer guy??? TERRIBLE…

Arrouba
Автор

This is wrong. Gadd and Netflix did everything except use her name: Gadd played himself which helps to identify Harvey; the pub in north London; the actress playing her was almost identical to her in build, accent, mannerisms, had same degree and job background and within minutes of the show airing, Harvey was easily found. She's received death rates and other unpleasant communications. In English law if a person is 'identifiable' then there's grounds for action if there are untruths and they've suffered harm. So far, no one has found the arrest, conviction and prison sentence for Fiona Harvey (real life Martha) and if it didn't happen then she has been defamed.

fionamclaren