Trustworthiness and Validity in Qualitative Research Design

Discussion of trustworthiness or validity in qualitative research design.

[Fifi-yhfy]

Thank you Scott, my supervisor had just returned my proposal to explain more on credibilty and trustworthiness. You have made it crystal clear. I can't thank you enough🙏🙏

[familymail]

Informative and easy to understand. I think this would be great for undergrads who are starting out in research for their capstone projects!

[datrivedi]

Thankyou so much for such detailed video it gave new insights for research

[jacksonkinyanjui]

Really wonderful and easy to understand.

[annikamin]

This is very helpful! I really appreciate the comparison with positivist paradigms. I also really appreciate how these are broken down into categories and lists. Thank you!

[TheUmaragu]

Very nice explanation Scott Self; the pace of the explanation is quite good, the example is valuable, the graphics supports this quite well.

[kwazinkosisibanda]

You are a great teacher sir. A very clear presentation.

[cherrygupta]

This is fr an amazingly informative video!

[abenadonkor]

So grateful for the detiailed explanation

[colleenfitz-gerald]

Excellent presentation - increased my understanding for my postgrad research. Is there a transcript of the presentation.

[shanicebrown]

This is an amazing masterpiece!. ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT! Thank you so much😇

[LinhVo-niwd]

Wonderful presentation. Thank you very much!

[alirezamoafi]

This was excellent. I am profoundly grateful as I have my Dr viva and helping a lot. Difficult scattered concept made easy (ish:) and organised.8/10.

[dzulhajjaeynabesiregar]

Right now i'm doin my research for my master degree.

So on my proposal, I stated that I will use:

1. Methodological Triangulation, because this research will played by several methods, a certain paradigm, a gathering method such as interview, literature study, and Critical Discourses Analysis.
2. Theoritical Triangulation, because I aproaching the phenomenom wtih severals theories perspectives, and;
3. Source Triangulation, because I interviewed different informant of certain educational degree, profession, and experties.

When I presenting my proposal, my Professor don't agree with all of this. Because they seem it as different play due to different method thay I will us, means a restart.

[sphekza]

Brilliant. I have learnt a lot. So on point. May I please reference this as I would like to use some of what you are saying here, in my own work.

[muhammadfaisal]

Thanks Scott. Very useful. Could you please share the complete reference of Terrell, 2016?

[ms.conner]

Dr. Self, Is Guba's comparative paradigm from 1991 or 1981?

[adie]

Thank you so much for uploading this! I have a question though:

This topic of trustworthiness usually write before data collected (chapter 3 of methodology) or after data collected (Chapter 4 of Findings and Discussions)?

Thank you!

[timmillington]

Great video thankyou, has anyone got the full reference for Terrell 2016 used in this presentation please?

[missacm]

Could you share your work - Self, 2019 - please?