GREAT 2A DECISION: ILLINOIS AW BAN DECISION BROKEN DOWN...

US Judge Stephen McGlynn issued opinions declaring Illinois's "assault weapon" ban to be unconstitutional. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner breaks down the opinion in geeky detail.

-----------------

Follow Along On Social Media

-----------------

The Four Boxes Diner serves up hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis. You’ll get the inside scoop from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author. Mark's books include The Official Handbook of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, First They Came for the Gun Owners, and Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back. Mark’s scholarship has been used by lawyers before the U.S. and his work has been quoted by a federal judge (Roger Benitez) in declaring California’s so-called “assault weapon” ban to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

To defend your liberty, you need to understand the “four boxes” of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box. We give you the information you need, and we hope to serve as your source for Bill of Rights news and analysis.

-----------------
SUMMARY
-----------------

[robertmckinley]

I would rather live in dangerous freedom than peaceful slavery

[RJ-TRB]

When they call them “conservative” Justices/judges, they actually mean “constitutional.” 🇺🇸

[JF-fxqv]

“MISTAKE, ” my butt! This “LAWFARE” has to stop and those abusing the law and the People must pay.

[steveparker]

The prior rulings weren't Mistakes, they knew exactly what they were doing.
Won't be surprised if the 7th circuit upholds Pritzker's unconstitutional law once again.

[TheDudeAbides]

As an Illinois resident, I can’t wait for this to be overturned. I’m confident it will be, it’s just a matter of “when.” I am concerned that there is going to be a ruling that doesn’t give us everything we want. Example being the legalization of semiautomatic rifles, but not magazine capacities above 10 rounds. And I sincerely hope we’re going to get the law in all of its entirety overturned. We cannot compromise any longer.

[Redacted-Information]

WTF
every gun was 50-75 caliber during the American Revolution

[midwesternoutdoorsandnatur]

Il resident here.
2nd amendment means
Shall not be infringed! Period. Thank you for the explanation of the trickery of those who propose gun control.

[gulffirearmsinstructionllc]

The 2A is the only Amendment that states Shall not be infringed. Thank you Mark for your knowledge and skill in explaining this decision.

[natecoozy]

Down state IL here. Thanks for the info and F JB!

[Antonio-itxx]

Mark, you are one of the most valued people in the 2A community.

[williamdavis]

There are no 2nd ammendment laws, it's a right!!! Not to be "infringed " that means no laws no regulations no taxes on firearms or ammunition!

[shoersa]

Thanks for your spot on comments here.

Very good that US Judge Stephen McGlynn followed his "instructions" and still ruled in favor of the 2A.

[bille]

Love Judge McGlynn’s breakdown.
Hate game-games!

[pcguru]

I don't understand why you do not have more subscribers. Honestly, I thought you were a geek the first time I saw you... NOW nothing but RESPECT!!! You ARE the smartest man in the room whenever 2A is discussed and I hope Trump has big plans for you even if behind closed doors as a consultant or whatever! I feel lucky that I found this channel! Don't ever stop Mark, FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!!!!

[rogerdonoho]

Chicago appoints our governors. Governor Fatbastard has got to go.

[sarys]

Do cars serve a purpose for criminals? smh

[clinthastings]

I never understood this idea that civilians shouldn't have military arms.

You have to remember that one of the primary purposes of the second amendment was to guarantee that future generations of Americans would have force parity with military troops, because our ancestors had just finished a desperate fight against the best equipped military on the planet, and private ownership of arms played a pivotal role in the success of that revolution.

[marktisdale]

Why would a Federal District judge be required to follow a ruling by the Federal Circuit Court that they are below when the Federal Circuit Court is not following the US Supreme Court that they are below? Make this make sense.

[jimmybutler]

The lawful citizens are not to lose their rights by the actions of criminals ! but some want to do just that !...

[MrPingn]

Glad to see. Keep up the good work, Mark.