Great Pyramid Revelation: SECRET CHAMBER Seen! (2022 Documentary) | Ancient Architects

---The Great Pyramid of Egypt has stood proudly for thousands of years, one of the most well-studied ancient enigmas on Earth.

In the past three decades, the latest technology has assisted the experts in uncovering some startling new revelations. Hidden corridors and voids have been detected with georadar, small closed doors discovered with the help of state-of-the-art robotic explorers, and less than a decade ago, two mysterious voids were found with the help of cosmic ray muon scanning technology.

But whilst the world waits for what happens next, a mystery from history has come to light. Buried in books nearly 200 years old, are some previously unseen, credible historic eyewitness accounts, accounts that contradict what we thought we knew about the history of the Great Pyramid.

Can they help us unlock a secret chamber hidden deep inside? is there a corridor below the Queen’s Chamber? Was its discovery covered-up more than 150 years ago?

In this video the Great Pyramid mystery only deepens as two startling eye witness accounts from 1837 could well change the narrative.

*VIDEO CONTENTS*

0:00 – Intro
1:50 - Previous Videos
3:21 - Howard Vyse Excavations
4:39 - Author Stefan Bergdoll
6:13 - New Eyewitness Accounts
6:49 - Visino's Visit to the pyramid
12:34 - Count Puckler's pyramid visit
14:53 - Was There a Second Sarcophagus?
20:35 - A Secret Chamber?
30:09 - 12 Key Points
33:41 - Closing Remarks

All images are taken from Google Images and the below sources for educational purposes only. Please subscribe to Ancient Architects, Like the video and please leave a comment below. Thank you.

Sources:

Music:

#AncientArchitects #GreatPyramid #ancientegypt

[HistoryforGRANITE]

It was truly a joy to work with Ancient Architects on this research. It's rare to get compelling new information on the Great Pyramid, and sorting it all out was thrilling. Stefan Bergdoll is rightly praised for finding those new testimonies from 1837. I personally have other ideas for what's under the Queen's Chamber floor, but I'll save those for a future video. How lucky am I to have Matt as such a gracious and brilliant collaborator.

[AncientArchitects]

I also have something pretty huge in the works too - can’t say anything yet but this, for me, is just amazing.

[Itsjustme-Justme]

I just read the original description written by Visino (google is as great as it is creepy). I think I found a small inaccuracy in the English translation of his despription of the Queen's Chamber. It may change the interpretation of what he saw.
On page 133, Visino writes: "Vom Eingange links, an der östlichen Wand, größtenteils in der selben, steht der etwas kleinere Sarg aus Marmor, offen, leer, einfach." - Left of the entrance (into the QC), on the eastern wall, largely inside of it, stands the somewhat smaller marble coffin, open, empty, simple.

I think that is pretty much proof that he had mistaken the square part of the tunnel in the niche for a sarcophagus.

He continues: "Unter demselben wird gegenwärtig nachgegraben, und es war bereits ein marmorbedeckter Raum sichtbar, welcher, angestoßen, hohl erklingt.
- Under the same (the coffin) an excavation is ongoing and a room covered with marble was already visible. When knocked, it (the room) sounds hollow.

My interpretation is, he referes to the discovered room sounding hollow, not to the coffin. That means he most probably did not see the inside of a newly discovered room. He saw a limestone block (or several) and believed it was the outer side of the wall (or upper side of the ceiling?) of a hidden room because it sounded hollow.
I think it is possible that what he saw was a ceiling blocks of the underlying corridor.

If Vyse really had found a corridor and had to cover it up again to prevent the discovery from getting stolen, it is bitter irony that now, of all people, Zawi "I don't believe in radar" Hawass is about to steal it.

[ancientsitesgirl]

Thanks to you, I rediscover my beloved pyramids, priceless information! Thanks Matt, come back to Egypt more often! ❤❤❤

[thomaslanghorst]

I watched until 17:16 right now, so I'm not sure if you will address this at a later point, but I doubt it.
First of all, I'm German and read Visino's text you showed onscreen. that said, I must make clear that Visino didn't say that the "coffin" sounded hollow but that he was talking about the dug out chamber beneath said "coffin", so in this regard you are absolutely right that the hollow sound of the "coffin" is irrelevant. And I don't know why he would knock on the sarkophagus anyway, since he clearly states, that it is open, which obviously means "without a lid", and empty, which he can see, because there's no lid hindering his view.
And before I go on I must say that the book we both are quoting of was written based on letters send by Visino to a priest in the Bavarian town of Passau, with Visino back than - as stated in the titel of the book - being royal Greek field chaplain and garrison preacher in Athens, so that the whole text might possibly be a translation, most likely from latin, especially since Visino sounds rather like an Italian than a German name. Then again was in 1840 the King of Greece a Bavarian = German who would most likely rather take a German than an Italian priest with him to Greece, and it is possible to have an Italian name while being German at the same time. So what I am saying is, take the following with a grain of salt.
Visino uses in the case of the Queen's Chamber the same word for sarkophagus as in that of the King's Chamber, namely "Sarg" = "coffin". If your theory, that Visino meant the outer part of the niche in the Queen's Chamber, was correct I would expect him to use a wording that would make the differences between both sarkophogae obvious, maybe something like "Grabnische" (literally "burial niche") in case of the Queen's chamber. And he says that the "coffin" is standing, too. I'm not 100% sure about English, but in German you can't say that something stands if there is nothing that actually can stand, even if we take into account that German did change quite a bit over the last 200 years. The whole text would have been written in a completely different way. And let's not forget that Visino says that the "coffin" stands "largely inside" the wall, he doesn't say "completely". I've only seen photos, but to me it doesn't look as if anything would stick out of the niche. And he can't mean the whole niche either, because this would clearly be much *larger* than the "coffin" in the King's Chamber.

tl;dr: I don't agree with your theory about the sarkophagus in the Queen's chamber.

[ashby]

If the hypothesis that the sarcophagus in the Queen's chamber was actually just a carved out niche for a coffin it is unlikely that Puckler would have said there were two simple sarcophagi. As a layman he would surely have distinguished between the two different structures and a layman would not call a niche a sarcophagus in my opinion.

[lmonk]

Another fantastic video. I've followed your channel for quite some time and it has been quite the journey: from fun speculations and fringe theories to some of the best documentaries into the ancient structures of the world. goes to show that your open mind and attention to detail really pays off on these sort of subjects.

[abelgonzalez]

I can't wait until we find the true expanse of past civilizations, all the underwater and buried sites have so much to add to this puzzle.
So glad your channel is so dedicated to this topic and the videos so well thought out.

[ludoviccelle]

This is fascinating. Congratulations Matt for finding new data so often ! You're a true researcher, collaborating with others in an admirable way. Thanks a lot for your amazing work, you manage to renew this quest like no other !

[peterhofmann]

Stunning. Pückler indeed was one of the most read authors in 19th century Europe. Almost forgotten today, but in the old days, he was a superstar. The inventor of travel-journalism. While in Egypt, he was under protection of Pasha Mehmet Ali. And Pückler was very much looking for attention - like he wanted to find the source of the nile! Needing money all the time, as he was living much over his financial limits. So Vyse's fear might have had a reason. 
BTW: Pückler is buried in a huge pyramid! His body was dissolved in acid and then the remains placed in that pyramid. And he was obsessed with the oriental lifestyle, dressing like a pasha at his home palace in Prussia.

[General_Confusion]

One of the big mysteries for me, is why the Egyptian authorities are so adverse to explorations, especially none destructive ones. With the technology and experts available, it still seems to take years to get permission to do anything, if they even allow it. Then if something is allowed they often don't want to publish the results. It's as if they value the mystery more than the knowledge. Unless they already now the answers. .

[dazuk]

I don't think that anyone could mistake that area as a sarcophagus...or box. A box is a box is a box if you know what I mean, and that looks nothing like one. There probably was a sarcophagus in the Queens chamber and somebody removed it. Sometimes the simple answers are the most likely ones.

[hardyg]

Sarkophag when translated into English from German can also mean tomb. It does not necessarily translate into a coffin like structure.

[arashghasemi]

This is one of the best episodes of ancient architects. Congratulations on the new insights and thank you for sharing with us 👏❤️

[Thex-W.I.T.C.H.-xMaster]

I believe the pyramids have more chambers than we think in them. Not just the Great Pyramid of Giza. These sites need to be more accessible. In Egypt most of these sites are closed behind locked gates.

Edit: Also let me say something I have believed for a while. Hawass knows more about the sites in Egypt than what he is telling us. Such has hidden chambers.

[reina]

I think there was a second sarcophagus built into -- or part of -- the well covert. I think to get under it, and behind it, it was totally destroyed because it was BUILT INTO the wall and couldn't be slid out of the way. I think the rubble in those photos are parts of it, but I think the rest of it was used also as backfill for the whole dug under it, and the rubble from digging out the whole in back was placed over it. That is why the rubble doesn't look like a broken up sarcophagus, really, it was only one side of one.

[melindadunstan]

Just wondering if Vyse's claim that the excavation was only 4 feet deep could have also been a diversion of sorts. If anyone came to check in the same spot and decided to dig down 4 feet and go a little bit deeper just in case they would more than likely come up with nothing. However if Vyse had stated he dug to 8 feet you would check to that depth plus a bit extra, possibly exposing something if he intended it to be hidden ?

[JonnoPlays]

This is what I subscribed for! Cheers! 🥂

[dorkfish]

Wow! Great video. Loved the "key points" section to wrap it up, it really helped laying out all this new information. I am so excited by this mystery and am fascinated we are still finding buried writings and there is still the chance for new discoveries!!

[johnnorth]

In the immortal words of Mick Aston - I think we need to start digging.