The World's Best Investor Sold

How about a slice for me Warren?
Outro music | @CMT8

#atrioc #clips #twitch

[isaiahsabo]

Warren Buffett should take advice from some REAL investors like the guy from my high school who keeps dm’ing me to send him money bc GameStop is about to moon

[betterbaulball]

It's actually crazy that Warren Buffet is 94 and still grinding on the stock market. I respect the hustle but I woulda cashed out at the first billion and enjoyed life ngl lmao

[owencmyk]

I feel like "There's only one thing worth investing in in this environment and that is doge" and "this is financial advice" would go hard as quotes in a lawsuit ICANT

[mocapcow]

I bought Doge at its lowest and sold it near its peak. yes, i did make bank ($62 profit). No, i will not be coaching Warren Buffet.

[itsAustinGreen]

he makes that chair look as uncomfortable as possible

[Mirtual]

He's so right about lying in market research. I used to be on these apps all the time that pay you for surveys and they pay so little relative to what they make you do so everyone just speeds through the questions pressing random things to get paid the quickest

[account-yicn]

Big A video, that means its time to go to bed

[Terp]

7:40 His eyes look almost fully white here

[BigTaxi]

I think Big A got possessed by the ghost of a shiba at 7:39

[rumplstiltztinkerstein]

When news networks are saying that this is the best time to invest, that is because they want to sell stock.
When news networks are saying that this is a crisis, they want prices to go down so they can buy stock.

[camzillaboy]

A well known dr once said, "Everybody lies"

[broadestsmiler]

If you overlay a chart of the S&P 500's value since 2000 over Buffett's cash holdings chart at 0:11, it shows that his cash holdings have always risen at the same rate as the S&P 500 with the exception of 2020-2023. This 2024 increase seems like a correction to get cash holdings aligned with the S&P 500 again.

[xenonyx]

cant believe the doctor was the gallifrey bay butcher

[NathanAtkinson]

Warren is 94. He's got maybe 6 years left, probably gearing up to leave thing to his successor and family.

[WackWacky-vced]

Guys I'm 20 minutes into the animated Grinch movie And nobody has even mentioned knee surgery, Am I watching the right one?

[horsebox]

Bro is turning into House, "people always lie"

[todo]

I lie on surveys and polls because I don't want our future AI overlords to be able to predict where I'm hiding after the apocalypse.

[scoccerball]

In lunch civilization you either do the one block jump for the lead, or the one block vertical jump for the mold

[uninable]

i sure hope no supernatural entity will invade my minecraft world!
the mythical herobrine: 7:39

[TechTehScience]

The polls weren't actually wrong this time, though. I feel like ever since Clinton v. Trump, where the polls were infact off, people now have a habit of claiming the polls are off if someone slightly behind winds. It was a tight race votes wise. It wasn't a tight race in the electoral college because it's winner-takes-all, but the polls didn't get this wrong either. They predicted that the election would effectively come down to four coin flips. A person winning three of those isn't likely but also not unheard of.

PA, which was again the most important state, had a 50.4% toward Trump. One of the four coin flips, and the other three were similar <1-2% differences. The result we got was well within the possibilities of most of the big models, well within the margin of error, and yes, accurately portrayed by claiming it was a tight race.

EDIT: to add an example to clarify how people are misrepresenting polling data. If I flip a coin four times and get heads three times, that does not mean that the probability of me flipping heads on any given flip was 75%. And most people wouldn't dispute this, but that's effectively what they're doing when they claim the polls were wrong.

For Harris to win, she would've needed to only win PA, MI, and WA (on top of what she won) and those three states were all won by Trump by a <1% margin. If she had won PA and one other of those three (but lost the last), she could've won with GA, which Trump won by a margin of <1.5%. These aren't one big election, they're individual elections where the winner takes all. These were our four coinflips.

If anyone is then curious how the respected analyst groups reached their numbers in the US elections (after the Clinton v. Trump fiasco), they essentially have simulations that are fed weighted polling data for each state and will then randomly generate a set of electoral college results within the parameters. The odds are purely the percentage of the simulations the candidate wins, how many electoral votes they won by is irrelevant since (as we saw in 2016) you can lose the popular and still win the presidential (which was a result which is accounted for).