A map of the Online Right & the Future of the Right Wing

Self-explanatory title.

-Timestamps-
Libertarians: 3:49
Jonesists: 5:18
Populist Conservatives: 6:55
Conservative Liberals: 8:20
Ethnonationalists: 10:44
Gröipers: 13:37
Intelectual Dark Web: 14:53
Traditionalists: 16:26
RW Historians: 18:36
Neo-Reactionaries: 19:48
Nietzscheans: 22:53
Outliers: 26:18
Interactions: 28:55
My location: 32:50
The future of the Right: 34:15

John Stossel: Yt: @StosselTV
Reason TV Yt: @ReasonTV
Alex Jones Yt: None
Valuetainment Yt: @VALUETAINMENT
Steven Crowder Yt: @StevenCrowder
Tucker Carlson Yt: @TuckerCarlson
Candace Owens Yt: @CandaceOwensPodcast
SFO Yt: @ShortFatOtaku
Dave Rubin Yt: @RubinReport
Keith Woods Yt: @KeithWoods
Richard Spencer Yt: None
Steve Sailer Yt: None
Nick Fuentes Yt: None
Peterson Yt: @JordanBPeterson
Stephen Pinker Yt: None
Bill Maher Yt: @RealTime
Weinsteins Yt: @DarkHorsePod & @EricWeinsteinPhD
John Doyle Yt: @JohnDoyle
Pax Tube Yt: @PaxTubeChannel
Matt Walsh Yt: @MattWalsh
Whatifalthist Yt: @WhatifAltHist
Monsieur Z Yt: @MonsieurDean
CallMeEzekiel Yt: @CallMeEzekiel
Kaiserbauch Yt: @kaiserbauch9092
Curtis Yarvin Yt: None
“The distributist“ Yt: @TheDistributist
“Academic Agent“ Yt: @AcademicAgent
Auron MacIntyre Yt: @AuronMacIntyre
Costin Alamariu Yt: None
Bronze Age Pervert Yt: @bronzeagepervert6323
Survive the Jive Yt: @Survivethejive
Russell Walter Yt: @russellwalter5145
Uberboyo Yt: @uberboyo
Ben Shapiro Yt: @BenShapiro
Elon Musk Yt: None
Carl Benjamin Yt: @SargonofAkkad
Paul Joseph Yt: @PrisonPlanetLive
Edward Dutton Yt: @TheJollyHeretic
Richard Hanania Yt: @RichardHanania1
Uncle Ted Yt: (Check your mail)
Camille Paglia Yt: None

[vovakarma]

Where do I sign for the Avant-garde Right? (No irony)

[gonzalonunez]

Curtis Yarvin said it properly, "You must be the opposite of what the enemy expects you to be".

[joyempire]

How on Earth is content like this and channels like The Distributist only in the tens of thousands range

[-wk]

The nrx friend enemy distinction is probably better described as "the good and currently disempowed elites" who would benefit from a more efficient meritocracy, similiar to a company VS "the bad, current elite" who are in power by disintegrating and taking advantage of an incomplete meritocracy

[Testimony_Of_JTF]

Something I like about the modern right is that at times it seems to know more about leftist theory than leftists themselfs.
One example is cultural marxism and just cultural subversion in general. A lot of leftists completely miss the shift that took place in their theory about how to achieve their goals. Nobody is advocating to hang your boss anymore because they already tried that and (outside of Russia) failed, the material conditions of the working class grew way too much for revolutionary ideals to win. The solution is the long march through the institutions and destroying traditional culture.
Every time I see a lefty speaking of cultural marxism they think it's just cultural bolshevism because they read the wiki article.

[nizam]

This video popped up in my feed (I have no idea how), and lets just say as generally left leaning person (social democrat-ish) who is a member of a certain demographic that I feel like everyone on the map probably wants gone from society (interestingly not touched on in the video at all), I found this video genuinely interesting and window to a certain perspective that I haven't really seen before, even if I disagree with some of the points made. Still watched the video to the end, and found it interesting learning about some groups I have never really had any experience with before.

[ThePrittmaster]

What I like about the right-wing of the internet is how honest it can be with itself, because we are not concerned with maintaining power. As seen in this comment section and my comment, constructive criticism is all around to hone each person's ideology. But without an actual way to put it into practice, we will remain football fans shouting about how they would've done things better than the coach of their team.
That's where I am a little black pilled like Dutton in how we are witnessing the decline both in the quality of culture and what is within our biology. That's also why I think it is futile in trying to capture the established intelligencia. Their quality has suffered significantly over the past century and it is easier to be left-wing, if you are trying to get status despite not being capable to earn it.
But I am not hopeless. Being right-wing is a natural part of being a man IMO. You don't have to read Nietzsche to know, that he touched something true within our nature. It is a sausage party here, but that's not really a bad thing. The younger generations are turning more "conservative" among the men. Yes, this is a bit of a cope, but an eventual change will happen and then it stands the test of history, if a right-wing ideology will be able to meet its demands.

[stanisawzokiewski]

I think bronze-ageists is a good term for the Nitzscheans. To include the neopagans.
32:40 I think we can confidently say that trads are going for the long game approach, believing that once progressives stop breeding then the trads will just naturally win the numbers game since they breed.
In this they somewhat share their strategy of distancing themselves from mainstream institutions like the popcons, libertarians and frogists(joneist) who also believe in either secluding themselves or creating parallel institutions.

[RightWingRefiree]

Candace Owen’s is gonna need some updating lmao

[karthikboyareddygari]

The thing is that libertarians have intersections with all parts of your map besides maybe the bottom right quadrant. For example I'm an ancap (to be understood as a legal and organizational theory) who's shrugged off the equalitarian assumption in favor of hereditarianism and am quite comfortable with (natural) hierarchy. I do prize beauty, competency, strength, and masculinity, being of the belief that they are being trounced in the modern age, but that doesn't preclude my ability to appreciate some of the genuine beauty we have at our disposal (Across The Spiderverse, Beach House, prog rock, animated math, some gay relationships since I'm gay, WhatIfAltHist, CallMeEzekiel, etc.). But that's not to say everyone needs to get along. Diversity truly is beautiful, but melting pots just water down the genuinely cool customs that various cultures have in favor of the urban monoculture that Malcolm/Simone Collins discuss. Ultimately, I favor a more disjointed society harmonized by markets/trade, impressive elites within each group, and a tolerance to outsiders paired with an expectation that visitors will respect your customs.

[lilpeckerponcho]

Great vid. Accurate n super informatibe. It seems ive slipped from a traditional liberal to a conlib and my descent into conservatism finally skidded to a stop in the "libertarian populist" zone, half a step shy of And im ok w that

[-wk]

Richard Hannia can be best described as "confused"

[channelnamegoeshere]

Some problems:
-Libertarians, Nietzscheans, and Ethnonats are too broad of categories. These are ideas that can exist all over the political spectrum. I understand that you're referring to specific spheres, but there really should be better names for these categories. This is especially a problem for Ethnonats, which is a broad enough category that all the issues you raised (abortion, how to win, sexuality) have no consensus in that group. Likewise, there are very populist Ethnonats (Rockwell), very elitist Ethnonats (Dr Pierce), somwhat moderate Ethnonats (Richard Spencer) and very radical Ethnonats (James Mason)
-Most Nietzscheans are not Bapists, and I dislike the fact that you used them interchangeably on the map. As somebody who somewhat falls into that category, BAP and his lackeys are absolute clowns. BAPists are a clique, not an ideology
-Ethnonats and Groypers generally hate each other
-You place too much emphasis on capturing the elite. Yes, doing so is very important. But the dichotomy between being purely focused on the elite and purely focused on the population-at-large is a false one. A good movement should have both broad appeal and intellectual rigor, as the two play off of each other and strengthen each other
-Most Ethnonats are not purely Ethnonats, most have some other ideology to go along with it. Franco's government was highly traditional, the reason the "intellectuals started wearing jeans" was because Spain was isolated and didn't have the infrastructure to match the rest of the world's (read: mainly America's) cultural output

Good video though
Also get a telegram, I want to talk about this without having to worry about Youtube's all seeing eye watching over me

[lukascomputer]

Interesting video. It was shared with me in a groupchat of bodybuilders. Always glad to see a fellow Mexican in the movement, we will rise in due time.

Keep building

[thetraditionalist]

I love this channel more and more everyday. You're more correct on the issues than anyone I have seen and this breakdown of the online right was perfect. I agree with your solutions here too. I find myself in the middle of NeoReactionaries, Right Wing Historians, Populist Conservatives and Traditionalists. While I fit best into the latter (hence my name), I have major influence from all these groups. I also have minor influence from all the others minus the corners (BAPists, Libertarians and Groypers). So I guess I am quite the centrist even though for mainstream people I am extreme

[fronti]

The best video I've seen in a long time. Good work

[gabingston]

I'd put myself around where you put Sargon on this chart. Might not be a coincidence, given that I've watched him on and off since 2016.

[gonzalonunez]

In few words, we need more cold headed and smart intellectuals like Yarvin or Mike Anton and less crazy edgy influencers like Fuentes or Alex Jones (without disbanding all the populist energy).

[zandaroos]

One thing though in the mainstream elitist corner (Hanaia’s zone) idk what exactly to call it but there’s growing organization of upper-middle to upper class liberal technocrats who’ve lost faith in democratic & free-market institutions and have drifted towards an authoritarian developmentalist model like Singapore but with “Western characteristics”. It’s pretty small and disorganized still, but given a lot of the people in that camp tend to have ties to academia, finance & policy wait 10-20 years and they could potentially be punching above their weight class.

Usually don’t watch rightist content but interesting video nonetheless.

[wanderingnotes]

Very good informative and comprehensive video. Congratulations! I recently started writing myself because I wanted to both polish the skill but also gain clarity on what I actually believe. Ironically the topic that first came to mind was increased political divisiveness both within and outside of the left/right dichotomy. Exploring the right (and left for that matter) more closely ties very well into that string of thought. I also agree that quality control is quite necessary. Though as with many things one has to balance such efforts. In particular it's important to offer guidance and feedback otherwise spheres run the risk of becoming too isolated, partly iconoclastic and ultimately become less likely in attracting others.