JOE ROGAN Speechless - JORDAN PETERSON Realization About the Bible

In his podcast, Joe Rogan interviewed Jordan Peterson and was left speechless by Peterson’s views on the history of the Bible, and how the Bible is the foundation of truth because it was the first book that ever existed.

#joerogan #jordanpeterson #bible

Joe Rogan
► Follow Joe Rogan:

Jordan Peterson
► Follow Jordan Peterson:

►Video footage: Licensed through Flexier.
►Music provided by Tunetank

FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
1) This video has no negative impact on the original works
2) This video is also for teaching purposes.
3) It is transformative in nature.

[DailyMotivationalJourney]

⭐If this channel has motivated you today, make sure to LIKE (for YouTube algorithm), SUBSCRIBE (to keep us motivated) & SHARE (to help others) here:

[ellenhulslander]

His mind works in ways that few of us can understand, yet he can make us understand what his mind thinks.
He understands the woven fabric of this thing called life, more than most.

[plumbermanu]

The fact that he said so much that was way above the heads of so many (including me) but said and explained it in such a way that it seems "Bloody obvious" shows what an amazing person JP is.
Love him.

[peves-]

The bible is a library from before there were libraries. I could get behind that as a concept for sure. When that's the only written book and it has tons of different stories written into it and they are all annexed by numbers and categories, it's just like a library built into a book. The bible is actually just an early library in concept before they thought of the idea of having individual books and storing them in a building designated to books. What a concept.

[JJ-gqsf]

It's like finding perfect geometrical relationships between the faces of a diamond, but not being able to step back and see and appreciate the diamond.
I don't know if it's a lack of humility that keeps him back from both seeing and perceiving, or what, but I fear that it is partly "worship the creation rather than the creator". That's a temptation we all face.

Rather than analysing tertiary aspects of the Bible, we need to ask ourselves: what is the message that the Bible is conveying?
Because, as a great man once said "it's an integrated message system from outside our time domain", and that is not just witty, but true.
How about answering the questions: what did Jesus mean when he said he is 'the way', why did he think that, and by what right could he say that?

[danielarcher]

So following that logic, if a saw is used in producing a house, when is the house complete by using a saw? I think it's obvious the the logic includes a prerequisite fallacy by limiting involved criteria to product.

[ivermectin]

What an astute man🙏🙏🙏🙏Travel safely, kind Sir

[nyworker]

Pre Reformation Catholic Theology is just that. Bibles were rare and only read and interpreted by the Church hierarchy. The printing press and Reformation threw that wide open

[guitarkidd]

Peterson is a brilliant man and thinker. But we can't make the Bible more than it was never intended to be.

1. First and 2nd century Christians never had a Bible. Think about that. Those that were closest to the actual life of Christ never had the "Holy Bible". At this time, oral tradition was the primary way of spreading the gospel. Shortly after did people begin to write down these oral traditions, or copy the letters of Paul and spread to the early church.

2. Majority of the early church, were illiterate. That is why oral tradition was the way to spread the gospel. A tangible "Holy Bible" would have been in vain for the majority of the church.

3. Many ideas and view points on the deity and humanity of Christ was grew and caused rifts in the early church. This is when man began to corrupt the true Gospel of christ and when the Catholic church got involved.

4. Peterson oversimplified the canonization of the Bible. It was the Catholic church, through its "councils" who decided what should be included in the Bible. And if you disagreed with the church, see ya, and the writings as the church tried to destroy the gnostic writings the church deemed should not be included.

5. Back to #2 a bit. After the Catholic church deemed what they felt should be the "Bible", they then said, only our priests can read and interpret it, not the "people". Hardly what we saw during the life of Christ or shortly after as it was the meek and mild that grew the church after "Hearing" the gospel. And then began the Catholic's church reign of hermeneutical monopoly.

6. The protestant reformation brought some change to the Bible, as the catholic church does have their own "Different" version. But today, especially in Westernized 'murica churches, we still have a lot of catholic beliefs nestled into our doctrines.

7. Christ never spoke of an official Bible that was needed or should come. Never. Any attempt to state this is an interpretational stretch.

8. Belief in the infallibility of the Bible is a doctrinal misguided narrative. Thank you Catholic church. Since the Bible never says this of itself, we can't assume that it does.

And no, I'm not some ex-catholic hater. Never was catholic. But I feel that influence that the RCC had on the canonization of the bible is widely ignored.

I do like the idea that the Bible is a like a library of history of the church. But sometimes we take historical narratives and turn them into didactic teaching, when really it's just a great story.

[KingHarry]

So the Bible is truer than true, because it was the first book ever to allow people to share stories, lessons, ideas and formulate relationships through text? I don’t understand that but I know I’m probably not smart enough to see his logic lol can somebody who is smarter please enlighten me on his perception of the Bible? 😅