What is Affirming The Consequent? [Definition and Example] - Understanding Logical Fallacies

Get the paperbacks or the FREE audiobooks with the links below:

How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic by

Timestamps
Intro - 00:00
Definition - 00:02
Example - 00:10
Outro - 00:18

------------------------------------------

What is Affirming the Consequent?

Definition:
Assuming there's only one explanation for the observation you're making.

Example:
"Marriage often results in the birth of children. So that's the primary reason why it exists.”

------------------------------------------

What are Logical Fallacies?

In philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy, or non sequitur is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example, propositional logic. It is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid.

------------------------------------------

Note: The above links are affiliate links, we get a small cut if you buy anything from the above links which in turn goes towards helping us provide you with helpful content like this. Support us by using the links above.

#logicalfallacy #logicalreasoning #logic #reasoning #winningarguments #mylogicalfallacy