Slavoj Zizek — My Ontology

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If you want to get Zizek's 'I WOULD PREFER NOT TO' t-shirt you can do so here:

iwouldprefernotto
Автор

2:09 "You need something to disturb perfection, so that retroactively the mirage of perfection emerges" very insightful comment here, and I think he explains it very well with his metaphor lol

bailey
Автор

It is only through the fall (of truth), that 'that through which the fall becomes', emerges

Reflection on the things that are through necessity, and the subsequent realisation that our limited human capacity cannot represent the world in itself perfectly, brings us back to the question on what the things *really* are

Destroianus
Автор

2:00 the obstacle that retroactively creates the perfection, the utopia, the absolute idea, the beginning of everything etc.

FG-fcyz
Автор

i am living what he is talking about. i am not alone. what will emerge i wonder? who will we become?

v.bryant
Автор

You can either separate yourself from chaos in order to be free, but you can also embrace the chaos in order to be free. I think chaos can never be eliminated as it is an inseparable part of reality, a balance. As Zizek says that without imperfection there is no perfection. Thus you must embrace the balance in order to be free, as once you realise that it is not possible to exist in a reality without chaos and that chaos is part of reality itself then you no longer have the need to eliminate it.

georgemichelakis
Автор

yees, "truth is the fall" ^^

Panosky
Автор

I think what truth is referring zizek here is so different to the truth being referred to by buddhists or other transcendental “philosophies“. Cant really approach they're depth through pure rationality. One must delve deep, as he said not from outside, but “falling“ into the practice, to meet that wich is presented by the philosophy. I wonder if zizek has ever got into these eastern mystical practices. And also, the whole plot of jesus coming as god on earth is to point out and show the path to god. That wich is hidden has to be found just elsewhere. And yes, division may be the truth also, but we know division... What about unity?

diegoperezsommariva
Автор

When atheists are ‘descender kabbalists’...As opposed to ‘ascender christians’...as an exp.
basically he shares a near total Judaic view of the material universe.

andrewmarkmusic
Автор

Not to sound too extreme but he should have a glimpse on Julius Evola...

Pistorius
Автор

Every time I listen to him I cant hold myself from blurting out laughing. Anything he says is just hilarious

jonblablabla
Автор

i could not understand his accent. could anyone please write it what he says. or share a link which is about this?

minmiriii
Автор

Nichiren Buddhism is not about withdrawing my friend, it’s actually about never withdrawing

mikemsea
Автор

" I cannot go into this now ..."

even more famous than the
"so on and so on and so on ~"

Any religion is an instrument of power to control the people .
That's what I'm sayin !
PURE IDEOLOGY and so on and so on ~ but I cannot go into this now 🤷‍♂️°•.

farrider
Автор

The fall itself functions as objet a?!

VigiliusHaufniensis
Автор

Zen Buddhism seems like Asian nihilism, but it's unfair to say it's a justification for war crimes. Any religion can be used for evil ends.

shannonattridge
Автор

Please the subtitels ??
It's a
Who POSTED this???
🌍

josephinestabel
Автор

3-4lbs? Toes too big? Nails uncut? Big knees? Wtf?

longstrongdiamond
Автор

Why are they laughing?.. He’s talking about deep things. In this way it looks like Zarathustra is being ridiculed in front of the crowd.

Upsilon-vcdj
Автор

Reality ith a math chaoth and tho on and tho on and tho on

jonblablabla