Tim Andersen - Quantum Entanglement In 5 Dimensions

Dr. Timothy Andersen discusses a 5D interpretation of quantum physics that may explain quantum entanglement in terms of higher dimensional classical physics and provides new insights into the 2022 Nobel Prize.

Dr. Timothy Andersen is the Principal Scientist at the Georgia Tech Research Institute. Tim is a Nationally recognized researcher in high performance real-time signal processing and machine learning, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics, which he received from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on computational physics, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, and High Performance Computing.

LINKS & RESOURCES:

A 5D theory may explain quantum entanglement

The Universe Of Tim Andersen

The Infinite Universe (Amazon, Free on Kindle)

[Neceros]

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:

00:28 *🧪 Tim's academic research focuses on Quantum Colusa Klein theories, exploring the idea of extra dimensions.*
00:55 *📄 The discussion is about Tim's article proposing a 5D theory to explain quantum entanglement, motivated by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics.*
02:43 *🏆 The Nobel Prize validated and brought attention to the experimental confirmation of quantum entanglement, a phenomenon that had been known for decades.*
04:59 *🎲 Using a dice analogy, Tim explains why quantum entanglement cannot be used for faster-than-light communication due to the no-communication theorem.*
06:48 *🧭 Tim proposes that the mathematical Fifth Dimension used in stochastic quantization could be a real physical dimension, with implications for understanding quantum mechanics and relativity.*
09:01 *📐 Discussing the history of extra dimensions, including Kaluza-Klein theory's attempt to unify gravity and electromagnetism, and later string theory.*
11:07 *🔭 Tim's approach differs from string theory by not aiming to unify forces, but rather to unify quantum mechanics and space-time using a 5D manifold.*
19:18 *⏳ In the proposed 5D model, time as we know it has a gradient of increasing entropy, while the Fifth Dimension has maximal entropy, resulting in a different experience.*
21:22 *🔗 Entangled particles are described as sharing a "sheet" in the Fifth Dimension, allowing them to interact locally without violating relativity.*
25:57 *🌌 Tim's next steps are to find ways to confirm the 5D model, potentially by tying it to observations currently attributed to dark matter.*

Made with HARPA AI

[roslynellis]

I don't think scientists can conceptualise past 4D's because of the limitations of our sight, our language & something tampered with our ability to access parts of the brain that may recognise beyond current limitations ie portions if our brain are switched off. Just a hunch. But thanks for covering stuff like consciousness, entanglement etc Tim😊

[IVANHOECHAPUT]

Quantum anomalies are thoroughly explained in the book, "Infinity, Time, Death and Thought".

[alphalunamare]

This Vth dimension presented here seems to be a Legoland of four dimensional spacetime blocks. Entertaining for sure but perhaps a little over egged? I have mentioned the Vth dimension being of a spacial nature rather than temporal as then there is no need for entropy or flowing or even dynamics. Keep it simple. The actual 'reality' might be that it is neither spacial nor temporal and indeed could be Complex ( in the 'i' sense) ... who knows at the moment? I think for sure that it has nothing whatsoever to do with String Theory but then that is my own bias against the grand theft of appropriation grants for little useful purpose. I disagree with the V shaped hands being used to convey meaning via spacetime cones as it is just plain hand waving obfuscation. I'd be surprised if 'going large' and trying to accommodate Dark Energy would help any but a suggestion as to why 'Energy' in the first place could be interesting. As for Copenhagen, at a spit, I'll leave it to Foxworthy :-) Logic says that the Vth spacial dimension is constituted by its origin and no where else. Not a singularity but you get my point?

[ToddDesiato]

Lost me about 8 min. in. I've shown that a 5D metric can be expressed as a 4D metric with a variable refractive index. Adding more dimensions doesn't help and is unnecessary.