Robert Mueller testifies before House Intelligence committee

Robert Mueller is appearing before the House Judiciary and House Intel Committees to testify on the findings in the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

[michaelg]

Mueller agreed with Escobar in the first hearing that the next step after his report was released was impeachment. End of story.

[excitedbox]

Every time Nunes says "You failed" those are things they were not hired to investigate so why would they. It is like saying you didn´t write about how great chocolate ice cream is, in an article about strawberry ice cream.

[IIVVBlues]

House intelligence... talk about an oxymoron.

[DangerousParent]

"INTiLLEGENCE" Committee 🤣🤣🤣  Sounds like there are aliens among us👽

[cincinnatidrones]

When a committee member gets a turn to talk why is someones face always in the way?

[tubruton]

Mueller's report doesn't even mention the Earth being round, proving the planet is indeed flat.

[MrPawPaw]

Bla bla bla. 5 mins in and I cant listen to these corrupt liars any more.

[excitedbox]

Why does Deer Park have product placement ads in the Congrssional hearings? If you look they all have the labels turned towards the camera. That is a sickening display of how Corporations buy the government.

[GLeszega]

Nunes dropped the ball on his questioning. Low energy like Jeb Bush, took forever to get to the point and tie up his questions. What a bum

[mikeyshmelby]

Can someone try to explain or post something which might explain why it it should be considered unethical or illegal for a presidential candidate (or a member of a presidential campaign) to have contact with a foreign official or a foreign VIP or a foreign diplomat or a foreign government insider or a foreign nobody?

Should contact between a presidential candidate and foreign individuals BY ITSELF be a crime?  Is it ALREADY a crime?  I have no idea and Muller himself purposely danced this  notion today without answering.

Is foreign contact a crime (for a presidential candidate?)  If not, Is this sort of contact enough to justify SUSPICION of a crime?

How is it even possible in 2019 (or 2016) for a serious contender for the presidency to NOT have contact with influential foreign individuals or powerful foreign leaders or foreign diplomats during an election?

Wouldnt ALL serious contenders for the job of president attempt to make contact with as many foreign statesmen and foreign VIP's as possible?

Wouldn't restricting this sort of contact be completely unfair to a challenger for the presidency and against freedom in general?

A sitting president who is running for re-election CAN have foriegn contact, trump will have this privilege AND privacy in 2020. 

Is the 2020 challenger (hopefully biden) allowed this same freedom of foreign contact?  If not, why? 

If bernie or biden become president in 2020 and there is any evidence that they or someone in their campaign had contact with ANY foreign element are the Republicans in congress suppose to begin impeachment proceedings?

And heres the BIG question, do you REALLY believe that 2016 is the first time that Russia (the former soviet union) or their political supporters here in the US have influenced (or tried to influence) our democracy here in the United States? 

This has been occurring for almost a hundred years.  Americans are free and can receive information or "influence" from anywhere.  This isnt new.

Russians attempts to "influence" are not new and also cannot be stopped.

[RARa]

why muller did not read steele report. mmmm dirty cop?

[CreatingwithWinglessAngel]

What a bunch of bull. Why have them swear in if they only just swear? Godless !!

[kenniles]

what a circus! Did Robert Mueller actually write the report? He doesn't act like he's familiar with his own work. After five minutes of watching him respond to questions, I was actually expecting a big hook to pull him off to the side followed by a loud "gong" as in the Gong Show (smile.)

[Fexlamtionpnt]

exonerate
verbex·on·er·ateig-ˈzä-nə-ˌrāt, eg-


ex·on·er·at·ed; ex·on·er·at·ing
transitive verb
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
ex·on·er·a·tion \ig-ˌzä-nə-ˈrā-shən, eg-\ noun
ex·on·er·a·tive \ig-ˈzä-nə-ˌrā-tiv, eg-\ adjective

It’s a word in the dictionary. Not a “legal term”

[ElephantsDoingCrack]

I didn't watch this because like the Mueller report, it's too long.

[GLeszega]

Dam mike turner killed it. He probably has a Ron jeremey sized schwance

[shortyrok]

Ms sewell is talking about gossip lol nothing factual

[jpgohard]

Hello comrades, we see you. I laughed at all your comments. Carry on...