Neural Interfaces: Connecting Humans and Artificial Intelligence - Thomas Reardon (CTRL-Labs)

Follow O'Reilly on:

[margaretfahey]

I am being unwillingly and non-consensually subjected to both Remote Neural Monitoring and Remote Neural Manipulation and I have been so for more than twenty years. I do not know who is Remote Neural Monitoring me or who is remote neural manipulating me and I don't know why they are doing so and I also don't know why members of the Irish government has not put a stop to it because it is a highly illegal act. At approximately 4.50 am on Sunday morning, 14th May, 2023 the muscles of my bowel were manipulated to move against my will by means of Remote Neural Manipulation. Various muscles in my body are often manipulated to move against my will because remote muscle movement is one of the capabilities of Remote Neural Manipulation. What is the legal name and the current legal address and the current location and the current occupation of the individual or individuals who caused the muscles of my bowel to move by remote means on this aforementioned occasion. A few minutes later, at fifteen minutes past five a placed this information on line only to be answered by a voice to skull direct communication message which said the following "I can't accept this". My response to that message is what is the legal name, permanent legal address, current location and current occupation of the individual who said "I can't accept this" and why can you not accept it.
My name is Grtta Fahey and my postal address is Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Eircode F12 Y560, Republic of Ireland. I have published my name and address here because a crime is being carried out against me and I am asking for the names of all those who are carrying it out and I am also asking for the names of all of those who organised to have this crime carried out against me.

[rthj]

Yes yes, this is old information. The problem that I want to hear about is how we decode and transfer that information into artificial systems. Is it possible to create a synaptic 1 to 1 bridge?
Ie.

Given that electrodes are an invasion with different make-up, I assume that movement and impact risk tearing upp the cell. And I assume that since the cell is ever changing, electrodes that pierce or attach to the cell lipid-layer will eventually lose contact. Given all that, I assume we need an other method if we want to be able to replace our entire body (save for the CNS ofcourse).

So what is it? Is the EEG (and other scanning methods) approach fast and detailed enough? Is the optogenetic variant possible in adult humans? And can the optogenetic approach give us full connectivity? The neural-lace and neural-dust, are these approaches feasible with blood-clotting and trauma stemming from forign non-biological components in our brains?

Other variants that I have read little about: Is it possible to control where neurons grow their axons? Why do neurons grow in featuses but not in adults? Can we regress neurons so they return to this state? Can we create a artificial synapse in which the actionpotential as well as the signalling chemicals can jump format?

In short, how far along are we until we can replace the entire body with an artificial sarcophagus, and what are the biological limitations associated with that? Would such connections last long? If not, why not? Can we create an environment for the CNS that does not create a millieu that builds upp slag-products and result in neurodegenerative conditions (Parkinsons, Dementia, Alzheimers, etc).

I understand that talks like this is aimed towards people with no understanding of biology. But there is a difference between using non-specific language, and having a simplistic an non-informative subject matter. Anyone interested in Brain-machine interfaces that have spent more than 1 hours googling it, already knows all this information. What we are seeking is more specifics explained in a non-konvoluted manner.