Positive externalities | Consumer and producer surplus | Microeconomics | Khan Academy

preview_player
Показать описание

Factoring in external benefits

Microeconomics on Khan Academy: Topics covered in a traditional college level introductory microeconomics course

About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.

For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Despite some of the negative comments, Im understanding this video fully and found it super helpful. Hopefully can meet you in person one day sir!

beomkomap
Автор

"Quantity... quantity... QUANTITY..." "nice tree... nice tree... NICE TREE..."

MrFlob
Автор

How does Khan know every subject?? lol

TheQsanity
Автор

Thank you so much. I think I can pass the exam tmoro :D

pravs
Автор

Is this the same as the MPB/MSB/MSC that the UK Specification teaches?

MrOllyMC
Автор

Instead of adding the $10/tree to the demand curve, could you also deduct it from the marginal cost curve?

StephandaSilva
Автор

i never should have taken an AP economics course...

DisasterBanana
Автор

The benefit is not all conferred on the consumer side. The new higher demand curve after the subsidy will result in a higher price along with the higher quantity so some of the benefit will go to the suppliers.

cfjrb
Автор

so what was the optimal level of production?

mike
Автор

But is it worth it, just by looking at the positions of the curves? @5:03 you could have an extra 1million trees/pa planted, but you have to give (2.7+1.0)million tax credits - and the 'deadweight' loss only looks like (1.0 million * $10)/2. That looks like $37m forgone for an imputed added benefit (from higher consumption) of $5million.

pauluk
Автор

There's a typo in the closed captioning at 3:10. It says "we're not talking about positive externalities, " but what sal actually says is "we're now talking about positive externalities." you should change that so people don't get confused

Poppop-xljl
Автор

Wearing a mask in 2020 is almost entirely externality. Do these principles still work in the same way?

ThePeterDislikeShow
Автор

I gave up watching stupid videos on utube coz I've enrolled at KHAN ACADEMY! my substitute to 'music to my ears'

rizalATmarcos
Автор

Hey,
I want to ask you how did you knew that it was 3, 7 milion.
What did you do to become to that answer?

Yassine__.
Автор

Is their welfare loss in positive externality ?

rajdeepsinhjadeja
Автор

Wouldn’t such “external” benefits increase the consumers willingness to pay so be factored in, in the original demand curve? (Given that the demand curve depicts the price a consumer wants to pay, the reasons a consumer wants to pay a certain price are in fact determined by pest control, air quality and niceness)

glenndwyer
Автор

Why do trees get more expensive to plant with a higher quality of trees to plant? Why does the cost per tree increase?

derekeano
Автор

You sound like Eli the Computer Guy! Are you?

jameslewis
Автор

when you are writing, you are repeating words. you should keep talking.

gozdavid
Автор

why is math always so macro?! i need something else, like words or story or something

louiswilliams