The Prisoner's Dilemma Explained in 2 Minutes

preview_player
Показать описание
The Prisoner's Dilemma is the most famous problem in game theory. Here I give a quick introduction to the problem.

Connect on social media. I update each site when I have a new video or blog post, so you can follow me on whichever method is most convenient for you.

My Books

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Clear and concise. Best explanation of the topic I've ever stumbled upon!

Frostbid
Автор

One of the best explanations I've heard yet. Thanks.

otoolifortunehaase
Автор

great explanation! my cousin is an economics professor who specialises in game theory and now I have a much better idea of the concept

paulmailath
Автор

You should consider that if you make me spend 4 years when we could have spent 1, when I get out I am going to find you and it won't be pretty.

charlidog
Автор

I'm deeply moved by this content. A similar book I read brought about a transformative shift in my life. "Game Theory and the Pursuit of Algorithmic Fairness" by Jack Frostwell

CandyLemon
Автор

I think this neglects to take into consideration prospect theory. People tend to be risk averse in the case of gains but risk seeking in the case of losses. So since this question is framed in terms of losses, I think in practice people would be more likely to take the riskier option of holding out on the chance that they would not lose as much. But maybe that's just if you adjust the problem so that there's not enough evidence for either of them to go to prison if neither confess but if one of them confesses they get a lesser penalty than the other. And then last place aversion is another consideration... So interesting!

MazyLoron
Автор

So, in other words, the theoretical maximum individual benefit cannot be achieved because in the end none will obtain it (2 years each in Jail is the result). Instead, the real maximum individual benefit can be achieved but only by cooperating

lorenzogumier
Автор

It is a logical fallacy. As prisoner A cannot know what prisoner B (the group) will do, then prisoner A is unable to consider a 'group beneficial' decision. Given a choice between 4 years for remaining silent if B confesses, prisoner A would be foolish to remain silent and run the risk of inuring the highest penalty. People want to avoid 'the worst thing'.

charliemcgrain
Автор

what is "hold out"? im not american.

malayneum
Автор

That wheelchair looks really unstable.

katzen
Автор

Holding out is good and confessing is evil.

DawnshieId
Автор

That's not true, because if my partner confess, I'll stab the shit out of him.
Therefore, it is never good for him to do so

kyoulpe
Автор

thanks a lot . its help me a lot in understanding political science . =)

nurmahdina
Автор

I didn't expect a British rozzer there 😂

alliedatheistalliance
Автор

Here's my question: how could you convince the other prisoner not to confess? Whatever you say that you're gonna do, they're better off confessing.🤯

redlightmax
Автор

With these situations, 99% of pairs who won't see each other making the choice, will lose.

witherblaze
Автор

Or claim racial discrimination and police brutality to earn 1, 000, 000 dollars and no jail time..

aa-dkzm
visit shbcf.ru