The mainstream has the Carolina Bays wrong....

preview_player
Показать описание
Join us as we delve into the controversial Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, focusing on the perplexing consistency of wind patterns over millennia. We explore why, 10,000 years later, these winds would seemingly align the same way, challenging mainstream explanations. Discover the concept of genetic classes of bays and the intriguing, yet contentious, evidence initially included in the hypothesis.

This discussion sheds light on the complexities of presenting scientific evidence and the rigorous process of validating hypotheses in academic research. Whether you're a science enthusiast or just curious about ancient climatic events, this video offers a deep dive into one of the most debated topics in paleoclimatology.

-------------------------------------------
#YoungerDryas #ImpactHypothesis #ClimateScience #Paleoclimatology #ScientificDebate #GeologicalEvidence #AncientClimate #AcademicResearch #ScienceDiscussion #ClimateEvidence
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I love how he admitted in this podcast that he is not sure if the Thunderstorm Generator is fraudulent. Malcolm Bendall is one crazy sounding dude. You can tell whenever he talks everyone around him is trying to figure out if he is crazy. I want to believe!

FractalToroid
Автор

true, but the dates obtained for the bays by geologists originate from using this flawed and non-peer reviewed eolian model of creation. those dates cannot tell you when the impacts occurred. if we want to talk impacts, we need to take those dates with a huge grain of salt.

AustinKoleCarlisle
Автор

Bob what the hell are you talking about?

BeeHash
welcome to shbcf.ru